2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of IV contrast media in radiotherapy planning CT scans: A UK audit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency is in keeping with a recent survey of radiotherapy centres by Williams and Probst. 21 This makes correlation between guidance and practice almost impossible for clinical practitioners. This survey identified that the most common guidelines in use across the UK were those published by the RCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inconsistency is in keeping with a recent survey of radiotherapy centres by Williams and Probst. 21 This makes correlation between guidance and practice almost impossible for clinical practitioners. This survey identified that the most common guidelines in use across the UK were those published by the RCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent survey of radiotherapy centre CT provision also demonstrated variation between testing all patients vs testing those at high risk only. 21 Conclusive evidence that renal function testing is required only in patients at high risk would make a significant impact on workloads, thereby streamlining CT services and waiting times for scan. Unfortunately, this evidence has yet to be produced and the question still remains should blood tests be performed on everyone or on patients at high risk only?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some guidelines identifying management standards were issued in 2010 and updated in 2015 [47], and stated that risk factors should be assessed for all patients prior to intravenous contrast administration, glomerular filtration rate should be assessed for all non-emergency patients, and a minimum rate of >60 ml/min/1.73m2 is recommended.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these published recommendations, there are variations in the routine application of IVC in clinical practice in RT. Clinical experience and expertise, clinical trial protocols and/or consensus contouring atlases are factors attributed to these variations [11,14,15]. In 2008, Kim et al found that 76% of the responding centres in a UK wide study used IVC for at least one of the nine recommended cancer sites, no department administered IVC for all nine of the recommended sites and 54% wished to administer it to additional tumour sites [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, Kim et al found that 76% of the responding centres in a UK wide study used IVC for at least one of the nine recommended cancer sites, no department administered IVC for all nine of the recommended sites and 54% wished to administer it to additional tumour sites [15]. In 2016, Williams et al published a follow-up study and found that 98% of these centres deliver IVC to all nine recommended tumour sites [14], but no department administered contrast to all of the RCR suggested sites Some recommendations from the study stated concerns for patient safety during IVC procedure and the need for definitive regulations and guidelines to ensure patient safety [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%