2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000037272.55380.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Internal Mammary Vessel Perforator as a Recipient Vessel for Free TRAM Breast Reconstruction

Abstract: Breast reconstruction is a cosmetically critical procedure for women and it must be undertaken to balance the shape, size, and position of the breast with the other breast. Since the first introduction of the free abdominoplasty flap in 1979, the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap technique has been a widely accepted method of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In breast reconstruction with a free flap, the selection of suitable recipient vessels is the critical decision to be made b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
51
0
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
51
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6] This has naturally led to the use of perforating branches of internal mammary vessels as recipients for free flap breast reconstruction. [7][8][9][10][11] The advantages of using internal mammary perforator vessels over internal mammary vessels include simplified and less invasive recipient vessel preparation without the need to incise or excise pectoralis major muscle, costal cartilage, or intercostal muscle; and facilitation of microvascular surgery because of dampened respiratory and cardiac chest wall motion and more a more superficial location. We presume that these advantages result in decreased recipient-site morbidity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] This has naturally led to the use of perforating branches of internal mammary vessels as recipients for free flap breast reconstruction. [7][8][9][10][11] The advantages of using internal mammary perforator vessels over internal mammary vessels include simplified and less invasive recipient vessel preparation without the need to incise or excise pectoralis major muscle, costal cartilage, or intercostal muscle; and facilitation of microvascular surgery because of dampened respiratory and cardiac chest wall motion and more a more superficial location. We presume that these advantages result in decreased recipient-site morbidity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15] These previously published studies report utilization rates between 9 and 39 percent. [11][12][13][14][15] In those reports, use of the internal mammary perforator vessels was limited by inadequate vessels or by the procedure being technically infeasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[7][8][9][10] To minimize recipient-site morbidity, our group has attempted to refine further the use of the internal mammary perforator vessels for autologous flap reconstruction. Several previous studies have reported the use of the perforating branches but only in a limited number of patients [11][12][13][14] or, in larger series, with limited frequency. [11][12][13][14][15] These previously published studies report utilization rates between 9 and 39 percent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements of the selected perforator were performed in two studies. Park et al 12 studied a series of five patients using the perforators as recipient vessels (four free TRAM flaps and one pedicle TRAM with perforator ''supercharge''), and reported an average arterial diameter of 1.56 mm and an average venous diameter of 1.4 mm. Hamdi et al 10 reported an average arterial diameter of 1 mm and venous diameter of 1.7 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%