2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-019-1023-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of genomic selection in breeding rice (Oryza sativa L.) for resistance to rice blast (Magnaporthe oryzae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In GS, a training "population" comprising individuals with wholegenome marker data and phenotypes is used to train prediction models and estimate marker effects, which are then used to obtain genomic-estimated breeding values of individuals that have not been phenotyped but only genotyped (referred to as "selection candidates") (Meuwissen et al, 2001). As several studies have demonstrated GS to be promising for rice blast (Huang et al, 2019) and wheat diseases such FHB, rusts, Septoria tritici blotch, Stagonospora nodorum blotch, and tan spot (Rutkoski et al, 2012;Juliana et al, 2017a,b), it is an attractive breeding strategy that can be effectively integrated in wheat blast resistance breeding to minimize time, cost, and resources for blast phenotyping in the field. In addition, GS can be potentially used by breeding programs to select individuals for resistant line advancement and crossing prior to phenotyping, and to increase the selection intensity by scaling-up selections for blast resistance to early generations of the breeding cycle, where large segregating populations pose a challenge for blast evaluation.…”
Section: Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GS, a training "population" comprising individuals with wholegenome marker data and phenotypes is used to train prediction models and estimate marker effects, which are then used to obtain genomic-estimated breeding values of individuals that have not been phenotyped but only genotyped (referred to as "selection candidates") (Meuwissen et al, 2001). As several studies have demonstrated GS to be promising for rice blast (Huang et al, 2019) and wheat diseases such FHB, rusts, Septoria tritici blotch, Stagonospora nodorum blotch, and tan spot (Rutkoski et al, 2012;Juliana et al, 2017a,b), it is an attractive breeding strategy that can be effectively integrated in wheat blast resistance breeding to minimize time, cost, and resources for blast phenotyping in the field. In addition, GS can be potentially used by breeding programs to select individuals for resistant line advancement and crossing prior to phenotyping, and to increase the selection intensity by scaling-up selections for blast resistance to early generations of the breeding cycle, where large segregating populations pose a challenge for blast evaluation.…”
Section: Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic selection has been implemented in many crops, including wheat, chickpea, cassava and rice (Roorkiwal et al, 2016;Crossa et al, 2017;Wolfe et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2019), and the number of programs that are moving from "conventional" to GS is growing. Results in wheat show that genomic predictions used early in the breeding cycle led to a substantial increase in performance in later generations (Bonnett et al, 2021 this issue).…”
Section: Why Genomics For Improving Breeding?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, GS has been implemented in many crops such as maize and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) (Crossa et al., 2017), chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) (Roorkiwal et al., 2016), oil palm ( Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) (Kwong et al., 2017), cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) (Wolfe et al., 2017), and rice ( Oryza sativa L.) (Huang et al., 2019), among others. Nowadays, many breeding programs around the world are starting to move from conventional breeding programs (based on phenotyping) to GS (based on predictions of breeding values or phenotypic values), because there is increasing evidence that GS can significantly save resources and shorten the generation interval, as mentioned above (Crossa et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%