2005
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of fondaparinux (ARIXTRA(R)) in a dialysis patient with symptomatic heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia type II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[158][159][160] The evidence regarding the use of fondaparinux is limited to case reports. 161,162 In summary, there is no direct evidence supporting the use of one alternative nonheparin anticoagulant over another in patients with acute HIT who require renal replacement therapy. There has been more experience with danaparoid than argatroban for this indication; however, although the highest level of evidence supporting the use of danaparoid comes from comparative studies in patients without HIT, the use of argatroban is supported by prospective data (albeit limited) and pharmacokinetics (ie, lack of renal clearance).…”
Section: Lepirudin (Recombinant Hirudin)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[158][159][160] The evidence regarding the use of fondaparinux is limited to case reports. 161,162 In summary, there is no direct evidence supporting the use of one alternative nonheparin anticoagulant over another in patients with acute HIT who require renal replacement therapy. There has been more experience with danaparoid than argatroban for this indication; however, although the highest level of evidence supporting the use of danaparoid comes from comparative studies in patients without HIT, the use of argatroban is supported by prospective data (albeit limited) and pharmacokinetics (ie, lack of renal clearance).…”
Section: Lepirudin (Recombinant Hirudin)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our patient, the thrombosis of left lower limb veins was diagnosed before the initiation of heparin. Fondaparinux is used to anti-coagulate patients with established HIT, as it has no affinity to PF-4 [7]. We have not contemplated to use novel oral anticoagulants, dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitors), and apixaban and rivaroxaban (factor Xa inhibitors) for these drugs were not approved for patients in stage 5 chronic kidney disease [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not interact with heparin-PF4 complexes, and the formation of a sensitizing complex resulting in an HIT is not possible. Many case reports and retrospective reviews have shown that Fondaparinux can be used in the treatment of thrombosis due to HIT (7,8). Recombinant factor VIIa can be used to reverse the anticoagulant effect of fondaparinux in case of severe bleeding with fondaparinux anticoagulation (7,8).…”
Section: öZmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many case reports and retrospective reviews have shown that Fondaparinux can be used in the treatment of thrombosis due to HIT (7,8). Recombinant factor VIIa can be used to reverse the anticoagulant effect of fondaparinux in case of severe bleeding with fondaparinux anticoagulation (7,8). Fondaparinux, like lepirudine, is eliminated primarily through the kidneys (and is contraindicated in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min), thus making the issue of appropriate dosing in dialysis patients uncertain (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: öZmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation