1996
DOI: 10.1006/biol.1996.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of ELISA forin vitroPotency Test of Rabies Vaccines for Animal Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The serum obtained showed a neutralizing antibody titer of [5,13,18,20,23,25]. ELISA in particular is an easy to use and highly sensitive method.…”
Section: Purification Of Rvmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The serum obtained showed a neutralizing antibody titer of [5,13,18,20,23,25]. ELISA in particular is an easy to use and highly sensitive method.…”
Section: Purification Of Rvmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Examples of the former are plaque assay [2,15,24], TCID 50 method, rapid fluorescent antigen test (RFAT) [1] and immunoperoxidase test [17]. Antigen assays include hemagglutination test [7], hemadsorption test [16], singleradial-immunodiffusion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [5,13,18,20,23,25]. ELISA in particular is an easy to use and highly sensitive method.…”
Section: Purification Of Rvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though some laboratories have used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to assess RV GP content for determination of the potencies of inactivated vaccines, variable correlation between ELISA and the NIH test (7,8,9,13,14,17,18,20) has been reported. Essentially, all these ELISAs incorporate the use of either polyclonal antibodies or hybridomaderived monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were analyzed to determine relative sensitivity and specificity, predictive values and accuracy (Gamoh et al 1996, Rooijakkers et al 1996, Strady et al 2000. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of positive results obtained by standard technique that were correctly identified by the two serological methods applied in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%