1998
DOI: 10.1076/anec.5.1.43.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Elderspeak by Young and Older Adults to Impaired and Unimpaired Listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When younger adults talk with elders, they simplify speech and alter the emotional tone (underlying affective quality of messages). 3, 22 The implicit message of incompetence then begins a negative downward spiral for older persons, who react with decreased self-esteem, depression, withdrawal, and the assumption of dependent behaviors. 21 Kemper and Harden 2 confirmed that cognitively intact older adults have negative perceptions of elderspeak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When younger adults talk with elders, they simplify speech and alter the emotional tone (underlying affective quality of messages). 3, 22 The implicit message of incompetence then begins a negative downward spiral for older persons, who react with decreased self-esteem, depression, withdrawal, and the assumption of dependent behaviors. 21 Kemper and Harden 2 confirmed that cognitively intact older adults have negative perceptions of elderspeak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ageist attitudes influence the quality and type of services that are delivered to older persons and/or those deemed less worthy of care such as aging homeless persons (Bowling, 1999;Cykert, Kissling, Layson, & Hansen, 1995;Damiano, Momany, Willard, & Jogerst, 1997;Ivey, Wieling, & Harris, 2000;Kane, 2002Kane, , 2004aKane, , 2008Pettersen, 1995;Reekie & Hansen, 1992). Speech patterns change when professionals dislike or hold negative attitudes toward aging clients (e.g., Balsis & Carpenter, 2005;Caporeal, 1981;Hummert & Mazloff, 2001;Kemper, Finter-Urczyk, Ferrell, Harden, & Billington, 1998;Kemper, Othick, Gerhing, Gubarchuk, & Billington, 1998;Reekie & Hansen, 1992;Ryan, Kennaley, Pratt, & Shumovich, 2000). The services delivered by professionals who hold negative attitudes to persons with mental health or ethanol and/or other substance abuse/dependence concerns are affected (Barnea & Teichman, 1994;Bartels & Smyer, 2002;Blow, Oslin, & Barry, 2002;Choi & McDougall, 2007;Kane, 2006aKane, , 2006bKane, , 2007Lakey, Gray, Ciechanowski, Schwartz, & LoGerfo, 2008;Rugler, 2000;Sadock & Sadock, 2007;Solberg, Maciosek, & Edwards, 2008;Wilson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Attitudes Toward the Homeless Young And The Homeless Oldmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This speaking style has been labeled secondary babytalk, patronizing speech, or elderspeak. Elderspeak has been observed and reported in both institutiona l (Caporael, Lukaszewski, & Culberton, 1983) and community settings (Ryan & Cole, 1990), as well as in laboratory pairings of intergenerationa l dyads (Kemper, Ferrell, Harden, Finter-Urczyk, & Billington, 1998). Elderspeak is characterized by simplified grammar and vocabulary, exaggerated prosody, and increased numbers of tag questions (Ryan, Hummert, & Boich, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%