2002
DOI: 10.1080/03610730252800201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recall and Subjective Reactions to Speaking Styles: Does Age Matter?

Abstract: Eighty-four younger adults (M = 20.9 years), and 70 older adults (M = 71.1 years) watched a videotaped presentation of medication instructions presented in either neutral speech or elderspeak. Older adults, particularly those with higher working memory performance, tended to recall more information from the elderspeak version. Younger and older adults agreed in rating the elderspeak as having both positive and negative characteristics. Findings supported our hypothesis that the relationship between recall perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phonological memory also appears to be related to listeners’ subjective ratings of speech. For instance, Gould, Saum, and Belter (2002) reported a relationship between listeners’ recall of spoken directions, their phonological (working) memory, and their subjective reactions to speech (e.g., rating the speaker as being kind and caring vs. patronizing and disrespectful).…”
Section: Phonological Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phonological memory also appears to be related to listeners’ subjective ratings of speech. For instance, Gould, Saum, and Belter (2002) reported a relationship between listeners’ recall of spoken directions, their phonological (working) memory, and their subjective reactions to speech (e.g., rating the speaker as being kind and caring vs. patronizing and disrespectful).…”
Section: Phonological Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all these models mainly evoke negative effects of elderspeak, a few studies also found some positive effects, including better recall of information and increased communication effectiveness (e.g. a larger quantity of information can be provided in task instructions) in comparison to typical speech (Gould, Saum, & Belter, ; Kemper, Vandeputte, Rice, Cheung, & Gubarchuk, ). To benefit from elderspeak without its negative effects, Kemper and Harden () validated a specific version of elderspeak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic elaborations and reducing grammatical complexity without shortening sentences benefited older adults in comprehension and self-rated performance, whereas receiving short sentences, slow speech rate, high pitch, and pitch variation led older adults to report more communication difficulties. Similarly, Gould, Saum, and Belter (2002) found a benefit in older adult memory when medication instructions were given in elderspeak, while younger and older adults agreed on the negative and positive aspects of such talk.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Intergenerational Communicationmentioning
confidence: 85%