Abstract:Positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) are widely used as a powerful evaluation modality in oncological nuclear medicine not only for detecting tumors but also for staging and for therapy monitoring. Nevertheless, there are numerous causes of FDG uptake in benign processes seen on PET images. In fact, the degree of FDG uptake is related to the cellular metabolic rate and the number of glucose transporters. FDG accumulation i… Show more
“…[2][3][4][5] In addition, the same trend has also been reported in malignant breast lesions. The increasing uptake of FDG over time in breast malignancies has been suggested to be helpful in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET studies.…”
Section: O R I G I N a L R E S E A R C Hsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…6 Several studies have reported that dual time point FDG-PET examinations with relative changes in uptake improve the sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosing breast cancer. 2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11] The standardized uptake value (SUV) is widely used for quantitative evaluation in FDG-PET studies. However, the SUV varies depending on the PET image quality, submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com…”
Section: O R I G I N a L R E S E A R C Hmentioning
Introduction:The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of using the partial volume correction (PVC) to standardize dual time point [18F] 2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) studies with two PET scanners. Materials and methods: One hundred and thirteen lesions from 96 breast cancer patients were examined. FDG-PET scans were performed at both 60 and 120 minutes after FDG injection using different PET scanners. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUV max s) were measured at both time points (SUV max 1 and SUV max 2) and the percent change in the SUV max (∆%SUV max ) between the two time points was calculated. PVC was performed using a look-up table generated based on the recovery coefficient curves and point spread function of each scanner. Results: The SUV max 1, the SUV max 2, and the ∆%SUV max were 5.67±4.45, 5.15±4.29, and -9.30%±20.54%, respectively. After PVC, all parameters significantly increased to 10.44±5.55, 10.23±5.77, and -1.15%±21.66%, respectively. In addition, the number of lesions with a positive ∆%SUV max increased after PVC, from 26.5% to 40.7%. Conclusion: PVC of the SUV max is considered to be useful for standardizing dual time point FDG-PET studies in patients with breast cancer performed using different PET scanners. This method is also expected to be useful for standardizing multicenter PET studies.
“…[2][3][4][5] In addition, the same trend has also been reported in malignant breast lesions. The increasing uptake of FDG over time in breast malignancies has been suggested to be helpful in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET studies.…”
Section: O R I G I N a L R E S E A R C Hsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…6 Several studies have reported that dual time point FDG-PET examinations with relative changes in uptake improve the sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosing breast cancer. 2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11] The standardized uptake value (SUV) is widely used for quantitative evaluation in FDG-PET studies. However, the SUV varies depending on the PET image quality, submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com…”
Section: O R I G I N a L R E S E A R C Hmentioning
Introduction:The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of using the partial volume correction (PVC) to standardize dual time point [18F] 2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) studies with two PET scanners. Materials and methods: One hundred and thirteen lesions from 96 breast cancer patients were examined. FDG-PET scans were performed at both 60 and 120 minutes after FDG injection using different PET scanners. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUV max s) were measured at both time points (SUV max 1 and SUV max 2) and the percent change in the SUV max (∆%SUV max ) between the two time points was calculated. PVC was performed using a look-up table generated based on the recovery coefficient curves and point spread function of each scanner. Results: The SUV max 1, the SUV max 2, and the ∆%SUV max were 5.67±4.45, 5.15±4.29, and -9.30%±20.54%, respectively. After PVC, all parameters significantly increased to 10.44±5.55, 10.23±5.77, and -1.15%±21.66%, respectively. In addition, the number of lesions with a positive ∆%SUV max increased after PVC, from 26.5% to 40.7%. Conclusion: PVC of the SUV max is considered to be useful for standardizing dual time point FDG-PET studies in patients with breast cancer performed using different PET scanners. This method is also expected to be useful for standardizing multicenter PET studies.
“…The perilesional location of 18 F-FDG uptake, as well as negative findings at the early acquisition time despite the presence of viable parasite, suggests that the periparasitic immune infiltrate is responsible for the increased uptake of 18 F-FDG in AE. Unlike most of the usual inflammatory or infectious diseases that have been studied using 18 F-FDG PET (30,31), AE lesions do not include any polymorphonuclear neutrophils, thus perhaps explaining why delayed acquisition reinforced the PET images rather than decreasing the signal on dual-time-point imaging. A rather unusual metabolism of the periparasitic immune cells that are maintained in a chronic status of tolerance might also explain an increase in 18 F-FDG uptake with time (32).…”
“…Interpretation and comparison of SUV values is difficult, depending on technical, biological and physical parameters (20). Although an SUV max of 5 is frequently proposed as a threshold (14,21) can be made from data of other centers because of different technical parameters (22,23). The four patients with uninterpretable results in our patient set had a low initial SUV max (<5).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.