2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study

Abstract: BackgroundPoor terminological consistency for core concepts in implementation science has been widely noted as an obstacle to effective meta-analyses. This inconsistency is also a barrier for those seeking guidance from the research literature when developing and planning implementation initiatives. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aims to address one area of terminological inconsistency: discrete implementation strategies involving one process or action used to support a practic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
626
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 588 publications
(678 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
626
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing recognition of the importance of identifying implementation strategies that are both feasible and impactful (Waltz et al, 2015). Digital implementation strategies such as computer-based reminders (Flanagan, Ramanujam, & Doebbeling, 2009), decision support systems (Roshanov et al, 2011), and alteration of computerized record systems (Nemeth, Feifer, Stuart, & Ornstein, 2008)are also becoming more common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing recognition of the importance of identifying implementation strategies that are both feasible and impactful (Waltz et al, 2015). Digital implementation strategies such as computer-based reminders (Flanagan, Ramanujam, & Doebbeling, 2009), decision support systems (Roshanov et al, 2011), and alteration of computerized record systems (Nemeth, Feifer, Stuart, & Ornstein, 2008)are also becoming more common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature [21, 33, 37, 39, 55, 56] and to enhance the exploitation of findings for decision making directing future strategic plans, the mean ratings of the modifiability (x-axis) and population-level effect (y-axis) for the youth, adult, and older adult populations were used to plot the position of each factor relative to all other factors. The resulting scatterplots identified four quadrants (e.g., I, II, III, and IV) of “Go-Zones”, reporting factors deemed relevant for their population-level effect but considered to have a low modifiability (Quadrant I), factors that have been attributed low ratings for both modifiability and population-level effect (Quadrant II), factors deemed relevant for their modifiability but considered to have a low population-level effect (Quadrant III), and factors deemed to be most modifiable and having the highest population-level effect (Quadrant IV), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation strategy is the term given to the array of available actions (Waltz et al, 2015). The outcomes in the taxonomy are acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, costs, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability.…”
Section: Assessing Implementation Processes and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%