2009
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of cardiac output to improve measurement of input function in quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI

Abstract: Purpose: To validate a new method for converting MR arterial signal intensity versus time curves to arterial input functions (AIFs). Materials and Methods:The method constrains AIF with patient's cardiac output (Q). Monte Carlo simulations of MR renography and tumor perfusion protocols were carried out for comparison with two alternative methods: direct measurement and population-averaged input function. MR renography was performed to assess the method's interand intraday reproducibility for renal parameters.R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(73 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gadolinium concentration was estimated using the ratio of the magnetization equations for the pre-and postcontrast images. 28 The mean vascular fraction was then multiplied by the total cortical volume to yield an estimate of AVC. AVC was examined as both a hemodynamic variable and a structure variable, because it could be a marker of either vascular tone or microvascular rarefaction, and distinguishing between the two was not possible from the imaging data.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gadolinium concentration was estimated using the ratio of the magnetization equations for the pre-and postcontrast images. 28 The mean vascular fraction was then multiplied by the total cortical volume to yield an estimate of AVC. AVC was examined as both a hemodynamic variable and a structure variable, because it could be a marker of either vascular tone or microvascular rarefaction, and distinguishing between the two was not possible from the imaging data.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of this component is approximately 0.02 min ) ( 3-5,32 ). These differences in absolute K trans may be owing to differences in imaging protocol and problems with absolute quantifi cation (12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Roi Analysis Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quantifi cation of DCE MR imaging data is diffi cult because of the complex relation between the signal intensity and the concentration of the contrast agent in tissue ( 12 ). In particular, the determination of the arterial input function (AIF) required for tracer kinetic modeling can be unreliable (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate measurement of AIF is critical for DCE MRI . Our preliminary study indicated that arterial blood experiences a wide range of tracer concentration, and so, for the SR sequence, TD needs to be properly selected to estimate all possible concentration values accurately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%