1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002449900064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Biota-Sediment Accumulation Factors to Assess Similarity of Nonionic Organic Chemical Exposure to Benthically-Coupled Organisms of Differing Trophic Mode

Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of developing Sediment Quality Criteria (SQC) to specify the acceptable degree of risk from sediment-mediated chemical exposure for the protection of benthically-coupled organisms. In this study, potential differences in chemical exposure for benthic organisms of differing habitats or feeding types were evaluated through the use of Biota-Sediment Accumulation Factors (BSAFs). It was hypothesized that If species of different habitats have similar exposu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polybrominated diphenyl ethers with the largest BSAFs 28 (BDEs 28/33, 66) had log K OW of approximately 6 to 7, with lower accumulation of the more hydrophobic congeners. This trend was generally consistent with other studies investigating BDE uptake by deposit feeders 27, 28, other studies of HOC uptake by deposit feeders 36, and highly chlorinated PCBs specifically 37. For HOCs with log K OW greater than 7, bioavailability generally decreases with increasing molecular weight because of stronger associations with sediment particles and lower solubility in water and digestive fluids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Polybrominated diphenyl ethers with the largest BSAFs 28 (BDEs 28/33, 66) had log K OW of approximately 6 to 7, with lower accumulation of the more hydrophobic congeners. This trend was generally consistent with other studies investigating BDE uptake by deposit feeders 27, 28, other studies of HOC uptake by deposit feeders 36, and highly chlorinated PCBs specifically 37. For HOCs with log K OW greater than 7, bioavailability generally decreases with increasing molecular weight because of stronger associations with sediment particles and lower solubility in water and digestive fluids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Di-ortho PCBs are numbers 18, 52, 101, and 138; mono-ortho PCBs are numbers 28, 72, 118, and 156; and nonortho PCBs are numbers 77, 126, and 169. The BSAF values increase with increasing degree of chlorination, but for the very hydrophobic hexachlorobiphenyls with octanol-water partition coefficients (K OW s) of approximately Ն10 7.0 , values tend to level off or even decrease [16,[26][27][28]33]. Within a subgraph, BSAFs of PCBs with the same number of chlorine atoms (PCBs with similar hydrophobicity) are pooled together, and the two (trichlorobiphenyls) or three (tetra-hexachlorobiphenyls) bars within each cluster are presented in increasing order of planarity (from left to right).…”
Section: Bioaccumulation Dependence On Congener Planaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a subgraph, BSAFs of PCBs with the same number of chlorine atoms (PCBs with similar hydrophobicity) are pooled together, and the two (trichlorobiphenyls) or three (tetra-hexachlorobiphenyls) bars within each cluster are presented in increasing order of planarity (from left to right). Therefore, this leveling off or decrease probably is due to the larger molecular volume of these congeners because of which it is difficult for molecules to penetrate lipid bilayers of cell membranes [16,26,33]. 2a) is a function of both planarity and hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Bioaccumulation Dependence On Congener Planaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations and sources of uncertainty associated with the use of the TBP model are discussed in Moore et al (2005) and references therein. The quality of TBP estimations is highly dependent on selecting adequate BSAF values, for which variability may reach several orders of magnitude for a given species and compound or class of compound (Tracey and Hansen, 1996;Moore et al, 2005). BSAF values are typically derived from single sediment-tissue data pairs derived from laboratory for field bioaccumulation testing or from co-located sediment and tissue collected from a field-site.…”
Section: Measuring and Interpreting Bioaccumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%