Evidence is accumulating that sorption of organic chemicals to soils and sediments can be described by "dual-mode sorption": absorption in amorphous organic matter (AOM) and adsorption to carbonaceous materials such as black carbon (BC), coal, and kerogen, collectively termed "carbonaceous geosorbents" (CG). Median BC contents as a fraction of total organic carbon are 9% for sediments (number of sediments, n approximately 300) and 4% for soils (n = 90). Adsorption of organic compounds to CG is nonlinear and generally exceeds absorption in AOM by a factor of 10-100. Sorption to CG is particularly extensive for organic compounds that can attain a more planar molecular configuration. The CG adsorption domain probably consists of surface sites and nanopores. In this review it is shown that nonlinear sorption to CG can completely dominate total sorption at low aqueous concentrations (<10(-6) of maximum solid solubility). Therefore, the presence of CG can explain (i) sorption to soils and sediments being up to 2 orders of magnitude higher than expected on the basis of sorption to AOM only (i.e., "AOM equilibrium partitioning"), (ii) low and variable biota to sediment accumulation factors, and (iii) limited potential for microbial degradation. On the basis of these consequences of sorption to CG, it is advocated that the use of generic organic carbon-water distribution coefficients in the risk assessment of organic compounds is not warranted and that bioremediation endpoints could be evaluated on the basis of freely dissolved concentrations instead of total concentrations in sediment/soil.

Recent studies have shown that sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soot-water systems is exceptionally strong. As a consequence, soot may fully control the actual fate of PAHs in the aquatic environment. However, sorption has only been characterized for a limited number of PAHs to diesel soot, and the mechanism is poorly understood. In this paper, we present an extensive data set of sorbent-water distribution coefficients (K(S), n = 236) for a series of PAHs (both native and added) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to five different types of soot and five soot-like materials. Both Ks values and physicochemical properties of the sorbents show large variation. In general, sorption is very strong, with K(S) values up to 10(10), showing the highest distribution coefficients on a mass basis ever reported. Sorption of in particular PAHs is often over 1000 times as strong as sorption to amorphous sedimentary organic carbon. The variation in K(S) values cannot be explained by "soot carbon fractions" or specific surface areas of the sorbents. Instead, values for native PAHs are mostly determined by the sorbates' molar volume, and values for added PAHs and PCBs are determined by the sorbents' average pore diameter. From differences in K(S) values between native and added PAH analogues, it can be deduced that generally more than 50% (with values up to 97%) of the native PAH concentration in soot is not available for distribution to the aqueous phase. We conclude that this is caused by physical entrapment of the chemicals within the solid matrix. Furthermore, most sorbents appear to preferentially sorb PCBs with planar configurations, a phenomenon most likely driven by sorption in molecular-sized pores. Pore sorption is also concluded to be the most important sorption mechanism for added PAHs together with pi-pi interaction processes with flat aromatic sorbent surfaces. Frequently observed, slowly desorbing, resistant contaminant fractions in sediments may very well be explained on the basis of these results.

During the past few years, the presence of soot in sediments has received growing interest. Soot is thought to serve as a strong partitioning medium for specific organic contaminants (PAHs). The precise extent of sorption to this material, however, is poorly known because soot/water distribution coefficients for native PAHs have not been determined yet. Measuring these coefficients using existing partitioning methods is problematic due to the nature of soot. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a method for the determination of distribution coefficients for organic contaminants in soot/water (but also sediment/water) systems. The method is based on solid phase extraction (SPE) of chemicals onto the plastic polyoxymethylene (POM). Sorption experiments with POM showed monophasic sorption kinetics, linear isotherms covering several orders of magnitude, and a linear relationship between distribution coefficients for POM and the octanol/water distribution coefficient. Therefore, the sorption process can be considered to be true partitioning. Application of POM for the determination of distribution coefficients for soot and sediment (POM-SPE method) resulted in highly reproducible values. The method was validated by comparing values for sediment with results for the same sediment determined using the cosolvent method. This comparison resulted in an almost 1:1 relationship, proving the method's validity.

No abstract

Soot contains high levels of toxic compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Extraction of PAHs from soot for quantitative analysis is difficult because the compounds are extremely tightly bound to the sorbent matrix. This study was designed to investigate the effect of solvent type on PAH extraction yield, to identify the most optimal solvent for PAH extraction from soot, and to gain insight into the mechanism of PAH sorption to soot in aquatic environments. To that end, different types of soot as well as coal, charcoal, and sediments containing soot-like material were extracted with seven organic solvents. Large differences in extraction recoveries were observed among solvents, with relative values as low as 16% as compared to the best extracting solvent. These differences were much larger for soot than for sediments. Dichloromethane, which to date is the most widely used solvent for soot and sediment extractions, appeared to be the overall worst extractant, whereas toluene/methanol (1:6) gave the best results. Based on extraction yields and solvent properties, extraction of PAHs from soot was explained by a two-step mechanism involving swelling of the sorbent matrix and subsequent displacement of sorbates by solvent molecules. Due to the low displacement capacity of water, desorption of PAHs from soot in the aquatic environment will be strongly limited. Moreover, a certain fraction of the total PAH mass on soot is suggested to be physically entrapped, making it unavailable for partitioning to the aqueous phase.