2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09545-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of biochar for the sorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from cattle manure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For materials of bovine origin (cattle dung in Figure 2a and slurry in Figure 2b), the classes of molecules were essentially the same, with the exception of a significant proportion of ketone present in the slurry, which was absent in the cattle dung. The main molecular classes of bovine fecal matter are in agreement with the classes found in the literature, with phenols, alcohol, aromatic compounds, indoles, halogenated compounds, hydrocarbons and ketones found in [14,15,17,26], and more broadly in pig effluent studies [2,41]. The same molecular families have been found for chicken fecal matter (Figure 2c), which is consistent with the literature presented by Sánchez-Monedero et al (2019) [42] and Dunlop et al (2016) [8].…”
Section: Laboratory Test: Voc Profiling In Different Effluent Mixturessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For materials of bovine origin (cattle dung in Figure 2a and slurry in Figure 2b), the classes of molecules were essentially the same, with the exception of a significant proportion of ketone present in the slurry, which was absent in the cattle dung. The main molecular classes of bovine fecal matter are in agreement with the classes found in the literature, with phenols, alcohol, aromatic compounds, indoles, halogenated compounds, hydrocarbons and ketones found in [14,15,17,26], and more broadly in pig effluent studies [2,41]. The same molecular families have been found for chicken fecal matter (Figure 2c), which is consistent with the literature presented by Sánchez-Monedero et al (2019) [42] and Dunlop et al (2016) [8].…”
Section: Laboratory Test: Voc Profiling In Different Effluent Mixturessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Effluent samples collected in the field can be kept at 4 • C or −20 • C until further analysis. The feasibility of such offline analyses and comparisons between a fresh or frozen sample have been described in different studies [15][16][17][18]. Offline laboratory analyses present the advantage of being more reproducible, less time consuming, and automatized, offering the possibility of analyzing a considerably higher number of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…layers of cattle manure. The results showed a reduction in the concentrations used in samples containing biochar [50].…”
Section: Biocover (Surface Application)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This study also showed that applying biochar as a cover on top of manure instead of incorporating biochar within manure was more effective in reducing NH3 [27]. Kaikiti et al (2020) reported up to a 60% reduction of total VOCs, a 90% reduction of NH3, a 90% reduction of H2S, and a 40% reduction of CH4 when applied 10% by weight of biochar made from cattle waste (pH: 10.43) [28].…”
Section: Chapter 2 Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%