2012
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2012.669507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an Andersen Bioaerosol Sampler to Simultaneously Provide Culturable Particle and Culturable Organism Size Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, particles were collected in stages designed to capture larger sizes. Similar results were also seen by King and McFarland (2012), where 1.8 mm particles deposited on the 2.1 to 3.3 mm stage. This may be due to the particles not completely drying and therefore having a larger aerodynamic size compared to dry PSL particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, particles were collected in stages designed to capture larger sizes. Similar results were also seen by King and McFarland (2012), where 1.8 mm particles deposited on the 2.1 to 3.3 mm stage. This may be due to the particles not completely drying and therefore having a larger aerodynamic size compared to dry PSL particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Several studies have modified cascade impactor collection methods to acquire more information than what is provided by traditional use of agar-based impactors. Recent research found that each airborne biological particle can be comprised of many organisms; for example, a 3 mm bio-cluster particle may contain up to 32 organisms (Kesavan et al 2014;King and McFarland 2012). King and McFarland (2012) used a modified six-stage bio-cascade impactor method to determine both the aerosol size distribution and the number of organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in accordance with previous reports made for different matrices [ 45 ]. The atmospheric bacterial concentrations obtained in our case study, using the flow cytometry, are in accordance with observations performed in other locations [ 65 , 66 ]. However, to date, observations mainly reflect large bacteria since some bacteria counts are still missing due to the sample complexity and the presence of very small bacteria or spores present in the background noise of flow cytometry.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With its great recovery efficiency, the Andersen 1‐STG with TSA may be considered as a sampling method in places where low levels of airborne S. aureus are expected (e.g., hospitals) and when the BioSampler is unavailable or unsuitable due to practical consideration (e.g., fragile because of its glass construction). Further quantification of culturable organisms from Andersen samplers is suggested, as more than one culturable cell in a culturable particle likely occur in fields (King and McFarland, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%