2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.06.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a silicon drift detector for cathodoluminescence detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a sample which is insensitive to the electron beam, the size of the acquisition area should not have any effect on the low energy peak count rate. It is the case for the Gadox sample and for the CsI:Tl sample A, down to 10 µm (figures 11,12,13). For sample A at 2.5 µm and for sample B, it is clearly observed that the slope of the count rate curve is lower for smaller acquisition areas and that the maximum occurs at a higher probe current.…”
Section: Size Of the Acquisition Areamentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a sample which is insensitive to the electron beam, the size of the acquisition area should not have any effect on the low energy peak count rate. It is the case for the Gadox sample and for the CsI:Tl sample A, down to 10 µm (figures 11,12,13). For sample A at 2.5 µm and for sample B, it is clearly observed that the slope of the count rate curve is lower for smaller acquisition areas and that the maximum occurs at a higher probe current.…”
Section: Size Of the Acquisition Areamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The exponential term K is proportional to the quantity of emitted light [12]. The major problem of the analyst is to find the good probe current range for its analysis.…”
Section: Filament and Probe Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation