2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a novel polyvinyl alcohol membrane as a pericardial substitute reduces adhesion formation and inflammatory response after cardiac reoperation

Abstract: The PVAM shows promising properties for its potential use as a novel pericardial substitute.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the strategies adopted to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesions (e.g., pharmacological intervention ( Lopes et al, 2009 ) or physical barriers ( de Oliveira et al, 2014 )), using biomaterial-based membranes is believed to be the most promising one. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is possibly the most extensively utilized and evaluated membrane used to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion ( Minale et al, 1988 ; Jacobs et al, 1996 ), but it has not been routinely applied in clinic due to certain shortages such as non-degradability, chronic foreign-body reactions, and predispose to infection over time ( Ozeren et al, 2002 ; Tsukihara et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the strategies adopted to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesions (e.g., pharmacological intervention ( Lopes et al, 2009 ) or physical barriers ( de Oliveira et al, 2014 )), using biomaterial-based membranes is believed to be the most promising one. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is possibly the most extensively utilized and evaluated membrane used to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion ( Minale et al, 1988 ; Jacobs et al, 1996 ), but it has not been routinely applied in clinic due to certain shortages such as non-degradability, chronic foreign-body reactions, and predispose to infection over time ( Ozeren et al, 2002 ; Tsukihara et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this needs to occur without an increase in the tendency towards infection. [8,[11][12][13][14][15][21][22][23] In spite of efforts to find an appropriate barrier, no satisfactory substitute has been found so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have focused on bioabsorbable materials because nonabsorbable barriers can cause a long-term foreign body reaction that can lead to an increased risk of infection and fibrosis development that obscures the view of the cardiac anatomy during a reoperation. Successful results have also been reported in animal models with hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose, [8][9][10] polyvinyl alcohol, [11] and collagen membranes, [12] as well as fibrin sealant patches. [13] The role of polylactic acid (PLA)-based bioabsorbable membranes in the prevention of abdominal adhesions is widely known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…168 Currently, numerous materials have been developed for the prevention of pericardial adhesions, such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and bioabsorbable membranes (Seprafilm). 166,169 However, the e-PTFE membranes tend to cause severe inflammation due to their non-biodegradability and the bioabsorbable membranes degrade too quickly in vivo. 170,171 Thus, the construction of new types of pericardial anti-adhesin materials is urgent.…”
Section: Nanofibrous Membranes For Prevention Of Pericardial Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%