2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/297630
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a Modified Comprehensive Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Characteristics and Functional Status of Patients on Entry to a Tertiary Care Pain Clinic

Abstract: The CPEQ, either the original or modified version, yields reproducible results consistent with the results of other studies. This technique may usefully classify chronic pain patients, but more work is needed to determine the meaning of the CPEQ clusters, what psychological or biomedical variables are associated with CPEQ constructs or clusters, and whether this instrument may assist in treatment planning or predict response to treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also managed to identify 29 tools (Table 3 ) which could be applied not only to adolescents but to a wider population set (0 years to adult age). Further five tools (Table 4 ): Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) [ 29 ], Poker Chip Tool (HPCT) [ 30 ], Comprehensive Pain Evaluation Questionnaire Modified (CPEQ-M) [ 31 ], Face Legs, Activities, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) [ 32 ], and Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD) [ 33 ] were instead specific for a pre-adolescent population (< 10 years), but could also be used in older patients or in mentally impaired adolescents unable to verbally assess their pain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also managed to identify 29 tools (Table 3 ) which could be applied not only to adolescents but to a wider population set (0 years to adult age). Further five tools (Table 4 ): Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) [ 29 ], Poker Chip Tool (HPCT) [ 30 ], Comprehensive Pain Evaluation Questionnaire Modified (CPEQ-M) [ 31 ], Face Legs, Activities, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) [ 32 ], and Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD) [ 33 ] were instead specific for a pre-adolescent population (< 10 years), but could also be used in older patients or in mentally impaired adolescents unable to verbally assess their pain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, such a diagnosis required detailed clinical information obtained by history, physical examination and review of files, combined with behavioural observations, and in the absence of positive investigations or findings. The above diagnostic classification has been widely used and described in detail in previous publications from our group [8][9][10][14][15][16].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large number of patients who complain of chronic pain there does not exist a uniformly agreed upon manner in which to classify it (Brunelli et al 2014;Renton et al 2012;Nelli et al 2013;Duckworth et al 2009). It is widely believed, however, that each different type of pain necessitates its own taxonomy in order to be properly treated (Viniol et al 2013;Rief et al 2012;Knudsen et al 2012).…”
Section: Current Research Related To Pain and Insomnia Painmentioning
confidence: 99%