2012
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.2207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use-Dependent Dendritic Regrowth Is Limited after Unilateral Controlled Cortical Impact to the Forelimb Sensorimotor Cortex

Abstract: Compensatory neural plasticity occurs in both hemispheres following unilateral cortical damage incurred by seizures, stroke, and focal lesions. Plasticity is thought to play a role in recovery of function, and is important for the utility of rehabilitation strategies. Such effects have not been well described in models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). We examined changes in immunoreactivity for neural structural and plasticity-relevant proteins in the area surrounding a controlled cortical impact (CCI) to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of our recent studies indicate that this assumption is flawed. 14,15 After a unilateral controlled cortical impact (CCI) over the caudal motor cortex (CMC) in rats, there are long-term forelimb impairments, similar to what is found following other models of damage to the motor cortex; however, we found that neural remodeling was severely blunted post-CCI compared to similarly placed and sized ischemic lesions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two of our recent studies indicate that this assumption is flawed. 14,15 After a unilateral controlled cortical impact (CCI) over the caudal motor cortex (CMC) in rats, there are long-term forelimb impairments, similar to what is found following other models of damage to the motor cortex; however, we found that neural remodeling was severely blunted post-CCI compared to similarly placed and sized ischemic lesions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…57,58 The fact that wrist and elbow movements are primarily elicited above 60 uA indicates that, even 41 days post-CCI, the motor cortex is highly dysfunctional, further supporting our previous findings that dendrites in peri-injury remaining MC are sparse, and NOGO is upregulated compared to control animals. 14 Nishibe and colleagues 58 found that wrist movements in the RMC post-CCI over the CMC required, on average, 11-20 uA more current compared to non-CCI controls. It is also possible that intracortical and corticospinal white matter damage, ongoing neuroinflammation, or other inhibitory mechanisms underlie the reduced motor cortex representation and higher movement thresholds post-CCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies have demonstrated features of neuronal plasticity after TBI in regions including the cortex and hippocampus. [50][51][52][53][54][55] Evidence of acute neuroplasticity in both the hippocampus and cortex has also been reported after acute ethanol exposure in rodents. 56 Disruption of this observed ethanol-induced neuroplasticity by impairment in the protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway, for example, results in heightened sensitivity to ethanol, which is manifested as extended sedation durations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,46,47 Though the mechanism for this remapping is uncertain, the short timescale precludes the idea of structural remodeling occurring to reshape the map because, unlike in stroke or lesioning studies, 10,48-51 compensatory structural neuronal plasticity does not occur in the contralesional cortex after CCI injury. 52 However, this does not necessarily rule out that compensatory motor learning associated with over-reliance of the unaffected limb 49,53 might occur to activate contralesional circuits without any major structural remodeling. The extreme asymmetry of limb use early after brain injury 44,52 and the finding that the maladaptive effects of nonparetic limb use depend upon the contralesional cortex 54 would support this as a potential mechanism.…”
Section: Ipsilesional Activation Increases In Novel Regions Chronicallymentioning
confidence: 99%