2020
DOI: 10.1177/0363546520952757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use Caution When Assessing Preoperative Leg-Length Discrepancy in Pediatric Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Abstract: Background: Pre- and postoperative standing hip-to-ankle radiographs are critical for monitoring potential postoperative growth arrest and resultant deformities after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: To determine the prevalence of apparent preoperative leg-length discrepancies (LLDs) that resolve at the first postoperative radiographic examination in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in order to understand what proportion of the noted preoperative deformities may have be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adequate radiographs require the patient to stand with bilateral knees in full extension with the patellae facing forward. If the patient is unable to fully extend the knee in the radiograph due to concomitant injury or effusion, the measurements will be inaccurate and a neutrally aligned extremity may appear to have an angular deformity or leg length discrepancy [13]. As always, a good clinical examination is important to ensure the patient is able to fully extend the knee and does so in the standing radiograph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate radiographs require the patient to stand with bilateral knees in full extension with the patellae facing forward. If the patient is unable to fully extend the knee in the radiograph due to concomitant injury or effusion, the measurements will be inaccurate and a neutrally aligned extremity may appear to have an angular deformity or leg length discrepancy [13]. As always, a good clinical examination is important to ensure the patient is able to fully extend the knee and does so in the standing radiograph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of SCFE who had undergone in situ fixation with screws at our department. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) in situ fixation with screws, (2) unilateral SCFE, (3) presence of LLD > 5 mm 30 , and (4) radiologic follow-up until growth maturity. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: a history of other surgical treatments such as osteotomy or epiphysiodesis, complications such as avascular necrosis or chondrolysis, or inadequate follow-up radiographs available for review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLD was recorded as a positive value when the affected side was longer than the unaffected side. LLDs were stratified into four groups based on cutoffs from previous literature 30 : no LLD (< 5 mm), small LLD (5 mm ≤ LLD < 10 mm), moderate LLD (10 mm ≤ LLD < 15 mm), and large LLD (≥ 15 mm). The articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) was also measured from supine anteroposterior hip projections at skeletal maturity (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLD is currently diagnosed based on measurement of the lower limbs from two‐dimensional standing radiographs 7 , 8 . However, three‐dimensional parameters provide improved reliability over two‐dimensional images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%