Background: The orthopedic in-training examination (OITE) continues to evolve over time. It is important for orthopedic residents and residency programs to have an up-to-date understanding of the content and resources being used on the OITE to study and tailor curricula accordingly. This study presents an updated analysis of the OITE hand domain from 2014 to 2019. Methods: All OITE questions related to hand surgery from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed for topic, subtopic, taxonomy, imaging modalities, and bibliometric factors related to cited references. Results: Of the 1600 OITE questions, there were 113 hand surgery questions (7.1%) over a 6-year period. The most commonly tested topics were nerve (n = 22; 19%), fracture/dislocation (n = 21; 19%), and tendon/ligament (n = 19; 17%). Complex clinical management questions were the most common taxonomic category (n = 66; 58%). Two hundred fifty-two references were cited, the most common of which were from the Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) (n = 76; 30%), Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (n = 27; 11%), and Hand Clinics (n = 21; 8%). Publication lag decreased over the study period ( P = .009). Twenty-five questions (22%) used imaging modalities, and 21 (19%) used clinical photos. Compared with a prior analysis from 2002 to 2006, there were more questions related to nerves (19.5% vs 9.8%, P = .041). Conclusions: Residents and residency programs can benefit from an updated understanding of OITE hand surgery content and resources. The current analysis identifies high-yield topics and resources that can guide resident preparation for the OITE.
Background: Skeletally immature patients with coronal plane angular deformity (CPAD) may be at increased risk for intra-articular pathology and patellofemoral instability (PFI). These patients may be candidates for implant-mediated guided growth (IMGG) procedures with tension band plates to address CPAD in addition to procedures for concomitant knee pathology. However, there are limited data on performing these procedures simultaneously. Questions/Purpose: We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of combined procedures to address both knee pathology and concomitant CPAD using IMGG in skeletally immature patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of skeletally immature patients who underwent IMGG and concomitant surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, osteochondritis dissecans repair, meniscus pathology, or PFI at a single institution by 2 surgeons between 2008 and 2019. Data on demographics, surgical details, follow-up, and complications were recorded. Deformity correction was assessed in a subset of eligible patients. Results: Of 29 patients meeting inclusion criteria, deformity correction was assessed in a subset of 17 patients (15 valgus, 2 varus). At final follow-up, 16 of 17 patients had mechanical tibiofemoral (mTFA) angles of <5° of varus or valgus. One patient developed “rebound” valgus >5° after plate removal. Conclusions: The IMGG performed in the setting of treating intra-articular knee pathology is feasible and should be considered for skeletally immature patients with CPAD undergoing surgery for concomitant knee pathology.
Background: An updated analysis of the pediatrics section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is helpful for resident education and preparation for the OITE. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated evaluation of the pediatric category of the OITE, and to explore trends in question topics and taxonomy compared with the previously published analysis from 2011 to 2014. Methods: Five years (2015-2019) of OITE questions, answers, and references were reviewed. The number of pediatric questions per year was recorded, and questions were subcategorized based on topic tested. The presence or absence of imaging or a clinical photograph was noted. Each question was also assigned a cognitive taxonomy level, based on a previously published classification system. Results: The percentage of pediatric questions on the 2015-2019 OITEs averaged 11.4% compared with 12.6% from 2011 to 2014 (P=0.349). The 3 most commonly tested pediatric topics were general trauma (17.8%), elbow trauma (13.2%), and genetic disorders/syndromes (11.2%). There was a significant increase in questions that required diagnosis and interpretation (27.6% vs. 8%, P<0.001) and a slight but not significant decrease in the questions requiring simple knowledge recall (26.3% vs. 35.5%, P=0.120) and decisions about management (46.1% vs. 56.5%, P=0.077). Overall, 65% of questions utilized clinical photographs or imaging studies compared with 62% from 2011 to 2014 (P=0.621). The most common references were the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Textbooks were cited less frequently than in the past. Conclusions: While the percentage of pediatric questions on the OITE has remained consistent over time, the percentage of questions requiring diagnosis and interpretation has increased. In addition, questions testing genetic disorders/syndromes have become more prevalent in recent years. The most commonly cited resources were high-impact journal articles, with textbooks cited less frequently than in previous years. Clinical Relevance: Knowledge of the most frequently tested topics and resources cited may assist orthopaedic residents in preparing for the OITE and orthopaedic faculty to focus didactic sessions on the most commonly tested topics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.