1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-679x(99)00019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usage of 3D roughness parameters adapted to the experimental simulation of sheet-tool contact during a drawing operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is experimentally observed [8,9]. It enables us to consider a representative part of the whole surface, applying symmetry conditions on the sides.…”
Section: Mechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is experimentally observed [8,9]. It enables us to consider a representative part of the whole surface, applying symmetry conditions on the sides.…”
Section: Mechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In all numerical examples mentioned above rough surfaces are modelled, in order to show the influence of different roughness properties on the normal compliance law. Now we shall consider a rough surface, obtained by experimental measurements, published in [8]. The initial FE mesh Table 3 Isotropic and anisotropic non-local friction is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is defined as the mean value of the levelling depths of five sampling areas. R pm quantifies the empty volume identical to the average peak height [4]. It gives reliable information on the functionality and surface shape.…”
Section: 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter is useful in the case of bearing and sliding faces, force-fit surfaces, measuring faces etc. Some authors [4] prefer R tm instead of R a since this parameter is not affected by the displacement of the mean line owing to the flattening of the surface roughness after friction. The well-known standard two-dimensional parameters (the R k parameter set) [5] for characterizing the functional properties are not included in the set of three-dimensional primary parameters [1].…”
Section: 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a lower CoF could be achieved by using EDT [9,10]. From a microscopic scale point of view, the characterization of the asperities and valleys on the die and workpiece surfaces could provide more reasonable expiations for many tribological phenomena in sheet metal forming [11]. For a given tool, sheet material, and surface finish, the friction is also affected by rolling direction of the sheet, sliding direction of the contacts [9] and the contact pressure as well as relative velocity and interface temperature [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%