2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology (CAIPT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/caipt.2017.8320714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability testing to evaluate the library's academic web site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5, the line chart in Fig. 6 presents the derived data clearly as also used in other works [40] [41]. The works listed in Appendix A indicate the main keywords found based on respective search strings (shaded, ticked cell) while other keywords found when studying the articles are also ticked but not shaded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5, the line chart in Fig. 6 presents the derived data clearly as also used in other works [40] [41]. The works listed in Appendix A indicate the main keywords found based on respective search strings (shaded, ticked cell) while other keywords found when studying the articles are also ticked but not shaded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, HCI provides the guide that individuals should connect with each other to derive user satisfaction, where an application should be designed to meet this subcharacteristic. However, software developers mainly novices are still lack of this awareness [30]. Hence, designing educational applications for inquiry-based learning activities must include the concept of visualisation to motivate user satisfaction and to easily help students in understanding and learning the concepts [31].…”
Section: ) Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Con el crecimiento en el número de aplicaciones desarrolladas en el mercado, un aspecto clave para garantizar la calidad del software y propiciar el diseño centrado en el usuario es la usabilidad (Arroqui et al, 2016;Ling & Chen, 2011;Macaulay et al, 2009;Yaohua & Zhengjie, 2006)scientists in a single lab. Según la ISO 9241-11, la usabilidad es el grado en que un producto software puede ser usado por usuarios específicos para conseguir metas concretas con efectividad, eficiencia y satisfacción en un contexto de uso determinado (Ferreira et al, 2020;Finstad, 2010;Martins et al, 2013;Retnani et al, 2018;Weichbroth, 2020). Así mismo, la ISO 9241-6 define la usabilidad como la capacidad que tiene un producto software para ser entendido, aprendido, operable y atractivo para el usuario, bajo condiciones específicas (Dzulfiqar et al, 2019;Gozález-Sánchez et al, 2012;Liu, 2009;Santos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Caracterización De Las Inspecciones De Usabilidadunclassified
“…Usability level is gained by conducting testing for respondents by distributing the questionnaire. Each question will be tested validity and readability that the data obtained from the questionnaire can be used as a solid basis for research data [11].…”
Section: B Usability Evaluation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%