2016
DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2016.1117280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability Testing as a Method to Refine a Health Sciences Library Website

Abstract: User testing, a method of assessing website usability, can be a cost-effective and easily administered process to collect information about a website's effectiveness. A user experience (UX) team at an academic health sciences library has employed user testing for over three years to help refine the library's home page. Test methodology used in-person testers using the "think aloud" method to complete tasks on the home page. Review of test results revealed problem areas of the design and redesign; further testi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Swanson et al (2017) noted that too many links on a page can be problematic. As a result, removing low usage links and pages is recommended (Mitchell et al, 2015;Denton et al, 2016). This parallels the findings of our study and subsequent removal of lowuse links, pages, and sub-menus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, Swanson et al (2017) noted that too many links on a page can be problematic. As a result, removing low usage links and pages is recommended (Mitchell et al, 2015;Denton et al, 2016). This parallels the findings of our study and subsequent removal of lowuse links, pages, and sub-menus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A total of 20 undergraduate students were recruited to participate in usability testing: five participants to carry out task scenarios on the library website and 15 participants to carry out individual and group card sorting activities. These numbers are in compliance with user experience research best practices (Becker and Yannotta, 2013;Denton et al, 2016;Nielsen, 2012a).…”
Section: Participants and Recruitmentsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It took into account 300 students and 86 university websites (26 from Canada, 30 from the USA and 30 from Europe) and it was found that 88% of the students were satisfied with their proposed usability criteria. Swanson et al (2017) argued that too many links on the webpage can create problems for users and Denton et al (2016) argued that low-usage links and pages should be removed to make a website more interactive and user friendly. Adepoju et al (2019) explained the research trends in evaluation of academic website usability from the year 2000 to 2018 and found that automated tools, heuristic evaluation and multi-criteria decision-making were used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%