1984
DOI: 10.1080/01446198400000013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US productivity and fast tracking starts on the drawing board

Abstract: ~ of Reudirlg. MfltireCori~llrts, Recidi~l Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method, while relatively risk-free, cannot necessarily meet the obligation of sharp deadlines. Fasttracking, through the overlapping of activities, is a replacement to the sequential approach and has been adopted since the late 1970s and early 1980s (Gray and Flanagan, 1984;Wearne, 1984). Since the 1980s, fasttracking continues to grow in popularity due to growing industry demands (Blacud et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This method, while relatively risk-free, cannot necessarily meet the obligation of sharp deadlines. Fasttracking, through the overlapping of activities, is a replacement to the sequential approach and has been adopted since the late 1970s and early 1980s (Gray and Flanagan, 1984;Wearne, 1984). Since the 1980s, fasttracking continues to grow in popularity due to growing industry demands (Blacud et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to their limited presence in traditional design discourse, shop drawings have started to appear consistently in the technical discussion on the organization of information in the building process at least since the 1960s, first with the studies on communication in construction and modelling of construction activities -such as those by Ward [13], Bishop and Alsop [14], Honey [15] and Turin [16], and then with the studies on the changing divisions of labour in building design -for example Gray and Flanagan [17] [18], Bennett and Ferry [19], Haviland [20], and, particularly, Pietroforte [21] [22] [23], Notably, these later studies remark on the growth of shop drawings in relation to other types of projectbased documents. More and more, decisions about manufacturing and construction at project level are taken on the basis of visual information produced by the building side of the process.…”
Section: Introduction -Shop Drawings and Their Currencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gray and Flanagan (1984) inferred that designs which considered the use of on-site technologies often resulted in higher labour productivity. Hinze and Parker (1988) also discovered the influence of design on the productivity of construction operations.…”
Section: Work Content Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%