1997
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.62.5.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urodynamic and neurophysiological evaluation in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.

Abstract: Aims-To determine whether Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy each has a distinct pattern of micturition abnormalities and whether a urodynamic evaluation could be useful in the differential diagnosis between the two diseases. Methods-Sixty two patients (30 with Parkinson's disease and 32 with multiple system atrophy) underwent a complete urodynamic evaluation and neurophysiological testing. Results-Of the parkinsonian patients 36-6% had normal micturition findings with normal bladder sensitivity; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Subsequently, smaller series confirmed the high sensitivity of the technique (75-100% of patients with denervation profiles), 12,19-21 even in the absence of urinary symptoms. 21 Conversely, several recent studies raised suspicions on the specificity of the procedure, 18,19,23 particularly for the differential diagnosis between PD 18,23 or PSP. 19 As far as we are aware from our practice, many neurologists hesitate to refer their patients suspected of having MSA for ASEMG, not only because of the aforementioned unsolved questions regarding the specificity of the procedure, 18,19,23 but also because of its embarrassing and uncomfortable reputation, its accessibility, and its interpretation difficulties caused by poor standardization of the technique, 17 variations in quantitative motor unit analysis, 18 and confounding factors such as age, gender, and parity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Subsequently, smaller series confirmed the high sensitivity of the technique (75-100% of patients with denervation profiles), 12,19-21 even in the absence of urinary symptoms. 21 Conversely, several recent studies raised suspicions on the specificity of the procedure, 18,19,23 particularly for the differential diagnosis between PD 18,23 or PSP. 19 As far as we are aware from our practice, many neurologists hesitate to refer their patients suspected of having MSA for ASEMG, not only because of the aforementioned unsolved questions regarding the specificity of the procedure, 18,19,23 but also because of its embarrassing and uncomfortable reputation, its accessibility, and its interpretation difficulties caused by poor standardization of the technique, 17 variations in quantitative motor unit analysis, 18 and confounding factors such as age, gender, and parity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Moreover, all these patients showed denervation and chronic neurogenic signs with electromyographic evidence of a normal bulbocavernous reflex at the external anal sphincter. 1,5,6 Patients who had Mini Mental State Examination scores below 28 or who had undergone previous pelvic surgery were excluded. In all subjects, anticholinergic drugs were withdrawn 1 month before the study and dopaminergic drugs were stopped the night before the study.…”
Section: Methods and Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of the autonomic sacral nuclei 5 manifests at electromyography with the finding of chronic neurogenic denervation of the striated urethral and anal sphincters. [6][7][8] We therefore investigated whether anorectal dysfunction might explain the symptoms of altered defecation reported by patients with MSA and whether their symptoms differ from those reported by patients with PD who have no chronic neurogenic lesions of the sphincter muscles. 9,10 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Происходящее вследствие ИБП нарушение функции множества структур нервной системы приводит к расстройствам моче- испускания. Распространенность нарушений моче-испускания у больных с ИБП оценивают в весьма широком диапазоне -от 20 до 77 % [7][8][9][10][11]. Ряд авторов указывают, что данные о частоте нару-шений мочеиспускания при ИБП зачастую завы-шены, поскольку исследования были проведены либо до выделения других заболеваний, сопрово-ждающихся синдромом паркинсонизма (например, мультисистемной атрофии) в отдельные нозологи-ческие единицы, либо в исследование включали также пациентов с другими формами паркинсониз-ма (например, сосудистый паркинсонизм) [12,13].…”
unclassified
“…Среди больных с детрузорной гипер-активностью у 75 % наблюдали нормальную уретральную функцию и отсутствие признаков детрузорно-сфинктерной диссинергии, у 7 % -псевдодиссинергию, у 11 % -брадикинезию сфинктера [7]. По данным F. Stocchi et al (1997), од-ной из причин обструктивных симптомов у пациен-тов с болезнью Паркинсона может быть нарушение сократительной способности детрузора вследствие развития в нем миодистрофического процесса в ус-ловиях длительной гиперактивности [8]. В иссле-довании I.…”
unclassified