Abstract:Trichloroacetic acid (TCAA), a known mouse liver carcinogen and a possible human carcinogen, is found in chlorinated drinking water. We measured TCAA in archived urine samples from a reference population of 402 adults using isotope-dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. TCAA was detected in 76% of the samples examined at concentrations ranging from < 0.5 micro g TCAA/L to more than 25 micro g/L; the 90th percentile concentration was 23 micro g/L (22 micro g TCAA/g creatinine)… Show more
“…The sensitivity is apparently insufficient, however, for monitoring TCA levels in urine of general populations who are exposed to dis-infection byproducts in chlorination-treated drinking water [41][42][43][44][45] . Monitoring the expected TCA levels of 0.5 to 25 µg/l urine needs much more sophisticated expensive methods such as isotope-dilution HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry 43,44) . No need of acid or heat treatment for determination of TCA alone is advantageous for practical application.…”
The aim of the present study was to develop a method of urinalysis for trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and trichloroethanol (TCE), and therefore total trichloro-compounds (TTC) as the sum, with least use of hazardous chemicals, being green in that sense. After acid hydrolysis followed by dilution with an ethanol (EtOH)-methanol (MeOH)-water mixture, capillary gas-choromatography with an electron-capture detector can quantify TCA and TCE in the diluted hydrolyzate. Comparison studies showed that the results were identical among three methods, i.e., 1. the method developed in the present study, 2. a head-space GC with acid hydrolysis of conjugated TCE and methylesterification of TCA 1) , and 3. traditional colorimetry with Fujiwara reaction 2) . When applied to exposure -excretion analysis, the three methods gave results reproducible to each other. Over-all evaluation therefore was such that the method developed in the present study is as equally reliable as previously developed methods. It should be further noted that the procedures are very simple, with minimum use of occupationally or environmentally hazardous chemicals. In case the determination of only TCA is requested, it is possible to skip the hydrolysis step so that the treatment prior to the GC analysis is even simpler, i.e., just a 60-fold dilution of the urine sample with the EtOH-MeOH-water mixture. It was also demonstrated that correction of urinary analyte levels for urine density in terms of creatinine or specific gravity did not improve the correlation with the intensity of TRI exposure.
“…The sensitivity is apparently insufficient, however, for monitoring TCA levels in urine of general populations who are exposed to dis-infection byproducts in chlorination-treated drinking water [41][42][43][44][45] . Monitoring the expected TCA levels of 0.5 to 25 µg/l urine needs much more sophisticated expensive methods such as isotope-dilution HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry 43,44) . No need of acid or heat treatment for determination of TCA alone is advantageous for practical application.…”
The aim of the present study was to develop a method of urinalysis for trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and trichloroethanol (TCE), and therefore total trichloro-compounds (TTC) as the sum, with least use of hazardous chemicals, being green in that sense. After acid hydrolysis followed by dilution with an ethanol (EtOH)-methanol (MeOH)-water mixture, capillary gas-choromatography with an electron-capture detector can quantify TCA and TCE in the diluted hydrolyzate. Comparison studies showed that the results were identical among three methods, i.e., 1. the method developed in the present study, 2. a head-space GC with acid hydrolysis of conjugated TCE and methylesterification of TCA 1) , and 3. traditional colorimetry with Fujiwara reaction 2) . When applied to exposure -excretion analysis, the three methods gave results reproducible to each other. Over-all evaluation therefore was such that the method developed in the present study is as equally reliable as previously developed methods. It should be further noted that the procedures are very simple, with minimum use of occupationally or environmentally hazardous chemicals. In case the determination of only TCA is requested, it is possible to skip the hydrolysis step so that the treatment prior to the GC analysis is even simpler, i.e., just a 60-fold dilution of the urine sample with the EtOH-MeOH-water mixture. It was also demonstrated that correction of urinary analyte levels for urine density in terms of creatinine or specific gravity did not improve the correlation with the intensity of TRI exposure.
“…TCA was measured in 402 urine samples from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and was found at detectable levels in 75.6% of the samples. This LC-MS-MS method was applied in another study in which the levels of TCA in the urine of individuals living in urban and rural areas were measured (Calafat et al, 2003). Individuals living in urban areas were found to have higher levels of TCA than those living in rural areas.…”
“…Triple quadrupole mass spectrometers are most commonly used with HPLC methods. LC-MS-MS methods for the analysis of TCA in human urine (Kuklenyik et al, 2002;Calafat et al, 2003;Ells et al, 2000) and HAAs in water (Hashimoto and Otsuki, 1998) have been previously developed and were discussed in an earlier section of this paper.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, no methods for the extraction of TCE by SPE were found. Several methods do exist, however, for the analysis of HAAs in water (Benanou et al, 1998;Martínez et al, 1998aMartínez et al, ,b, 1999Loos and Barcelo, 2001;Carrero and Rusling, 1999;Sarzanini et al, 1999) and urine (Kuklenyik et al, 2002;Calafat et al, 2003) using SPE.…”
Trichloroethylene (TCE) and some of its metabolites are potentially carcinogenic compounds that the general population is commonly exposed to in drinking water. Concentrations of TCE, dichloroacetic acid (DCA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) given to laboratory animals in cancer bioassays are high, whereas drinking water levels of the compounds are very low. It is not clear whether the trace amounts of TCE, DCA and TCA in drinking water pose a cancer risk to humans. The accuracy of pharmacokinetic studies relies on the analytical method from which blood and tissue concentration data are obtained. Models that extrapolate cancer risks of TCE and its metabolites from laboratory animals to humans, in turn, rely on the results of pharmacokinetic studies. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable analytical methods for the analysis of TCE and its metabolites. This paper reviews the methods currently in the literature for the analysis of TCE, DCA, TCA and, to a lesser extent, chloral hydrate (CH). Additional aspects of analytical methods such as method validation, species preservation and future directions in the analysis of TCE and its metabolites are also discussed.
“…이 표준 원액을 각각 0.5, 0.5, 10 mL씩 취하여 100 mL 용량 플라스크에 옮기고 탈이온수로 희석하여 각각 10, 10, Calafat et al, 2003;Bader et al, 2004). Figure 1은 휘발성 유기화합물 생체시료 대상자의 되고 있다 (Imbriani et al, 2001).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.