Abstract:Study design: A retrospective study concerning urinary tract infections in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Objectives: To check whether the regular (1/week) urine cultures allow a more accurate treatment of urinary tract infections in SCI patients compared to empiric treatment. Setting: Ghent University Hospital, East-Flanders, Belgium. Methods: Group 1: 24 tetraplegic patients; group 2: 22 paraplegic patients; group 3: 28 other polytrauma patients as controls. These groups were chosen as catheterisation an… Show more
“…It is noteworthy that, UTI is the commonest reported of all complications of SCI in all series. 18,19 It is also worth mentioning that the series of W&D had a large proportion of sacral lesions, 47 out of 316 patients (15%), whereas in our group sacral lesions constituted only 1.7%. The density of the neurological deficit of W&D's series was not described.…”
Study design: Retrospective longitudinal study of short-and long-term urinary complications in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients managed at the Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries (MCSI). Setting: MCSI, Oswestry, UK. Method: A total of 185 SCI patients were admitted to the MCSI between 1984 and 1989. Only 119 patients who met the following criteria were included: traumatic SCI, Frankel grade A-D, admission within 6 weeks post injury, regular annual follow-up or alternate year at MCSI, follow-up longer than 8 years. Follow-up ranged between 8 and 21 years with a mean of 17.7 (s.d. ¼ 1.98). The method of bladder drainage varied from the time of injury. Drainage was by indwelling urethral catheterisation (IndUC) before admission to the MCSI. Within 24 h of admission, assisted clean intermittent catheterisation (ACIC) by the nursing staff was commenced. This was followed by clean intermittent self catheterisation (CISC) once the patient was mobilised in the wheel chair and trained in the procedure. When detrusor reflex activity develops, patients with good hand function were given a choice between CISC and reflex voiding (RV). Patients with poor hand function are given the choice between RV, suprapubic catheters or ACIC during hospitalisation and after discharge. Only a minority of these patients choose ACIC following discharge. RV was supplemented occasionally by sphincterotomy. There were 99 males and 20 females (5:1). The age at the time of injury was 16-63 years with a mean of 29 (s.d. ¼ 12). Instead of a single method, a pattern of bladder management was analysed in the context of three continuous phases: Phase1 preadmission to MCSI. Phase2 during first hospitalisation at MCSI. Phase3 post discharge. In each phase, the patients were divided into those with and without complications. The complications were analysed in relation to the management and other relevant factors. Results: The total complication rate at all stages was 62%. Complications of the upper urinary tract accounted for 22.6%. These results compared favourably with published material. Conclusion: The sequential system of supervised bladder management commencing with brief IndUC followed by IntC and/or RV remains effective in keeping the complication rate relatively low in SCI patients, who undergo regular surveillance and timely intervention. Sponsorship: The project was supported by SPIRIT, a charitable not for profit trust that supports teaching, training, clinical research and dissemination of knowledge about all aspects of spinal paralysis in the UK.
“…It is noteworthy that, UTI is the commonest reported of all complications of SCI in all series. 18,19 It is also worth mentioning that the series of W&D had a large proportion of sacral lesions, 47 out of 316 patients (15%), whereas in our group sacral lesions constituted only 1.7%. The density of the neurological deficit of W&D's series was not described.…”
Study design: Retrospective longitudinal study of short-and long-term urinary complications in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients managed at the Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries (MCSI). Setting: MCSI, Oswestry, UK. Method: A total of 185 SCI patients were admitted to the MCSI between 1984 and 1989. Only 119 patients who met the following criteria were included: traumatic SCI, Frankel grade A-D, admission within 6 weeks post injury, regular annual follow-up or alternate year at MCSI, follow-up longer than 8 years. Follow-up ranged between 8 and 21 years with a mean of 17.7 (s.d. ¼ 1.98). The method of bladder drainage varied from the time of injury. Drainage was by indwelling urethral catheterisation (IndUC) before admission to the MCSI. Within 24 h of admission, assisted clean intermittent catheterisation (ACIC) by the nursing staff was commenced. This was followed by clean intermittent self catheterisation (CISC) once the patient was mobilised in the wheel chair and trained in the procedure. When detrusor reflex activity develops, patients with good hand function were given a choice between CISC and reflex voiding (RV). Patients with poor hand function are given the choice between RV, suprapubic catheters or ACIC during hospitalisation and after discharge. Only a minority of these patients choose ACIC following discharge. RV was supplemented occasionally by sphincterotomy. There were 99 males and 20 females (5:1). The age at the time of injury was 16-63 years with a mean of 29 (s.d. ¼ 12). Instead of a single method, a pattern of bladder management was analysed in the context of three continuous phases: Phase1 preadmission to MCSI. Phase2 during first hospitalisation at MCSI. Phase3 post discharge. In each phase, the patients were divided into those with and without complications. The complications were analysed in relation to the management and other relevant factors. Results: The total complication rate at all stages was 62%. Complications of the upper urinary tract accounted for 22.6%. These results compared favourably with published material. Conclusion: The sequential system of supervised bladder management commencing with brief IndUC followed by IntC and/or RV remains effective in keeping the complication rate relatively low in SCI patients, who undergo regular surveillance and timely intervention. Sponsorship: The project was supported by SPIRIT, a charitable not for profit trust that supports teaching, training, clinical research and dissemination of knowledge about all aspects of spinal paralysis in the UK.
“…5,6 No uniform definition of UTI was used in articles. 6,[14][15][16]18,23 In a long-term follow-up (ranged between 8 and 21 years, with a mean of 17.7 years) study evaluating the outcomes of bladder management in 119 SCI patients, 61% of the patients were reported to have complications. UTI stands out as the most common (80.1%) complication either alone (50%) or in combination with other complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common complication in patients with SCI. 5,6 Problems related to UTIs are the most frequent reason for hospital readmissions, and symptoms such as autonomic dysreflexia and incontinence can cause serious physical disturbances or social inconvenience in the lives of those with SCI. 7 In order to reduce morbidity and to prevent urological complications, regular follow-up visits to a spinal cord rehabilitation clinic are required.…”
Study design: Multi-center, cross-sectional study. Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the treatment methods and follow-up of neurogenic bladder in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury retrospectively using a questionnaire. Setting: Turkey. Methods: Three hundred and thirty-seven patients who had spinal cord injury for at least 2 years were enrolled from six centers in the neurogenic bladder study group. They were asked to fill-out a questionnaire about treatments they received and techniques they used for bladder management. Results: The study included 246 male and 91 female patients with a mean age of 42±14 years. Intermittent catheterization (IC) was performed in 77.9% of the patients, 3.8% had indwelling catheters, 13.8% had normal spontaneous micturition, 2.6% performed voiding maneuvers, 1.3% used diapers and 0.6% used condom catheters. No gender difference was found regarding the techniques used in bladder rehabilitation (P40.05). Overall, 63.2% of patients used anticholinergic drugs; anticholinergic drug use was similar between genders (P40.05). The most common anticholinergic drug used was oxybutynin (40.3%), followed by trospium (32.6%), tolterodine (19.3%) darifenacin (3.3%), propiverine (3.3%) and solifenacin (1.1%). The specialties of the physicians who first prescribed the anticholinergic drug were physiatrists (76.2%), urologists (22.1%) and neurologists (1.7%). Only four patients had previously received injections of botulinum-toxin-A into the detrusor muscle and three of them stated that their symptoms showed improvement. Most of the patients (77%) had regular follow-up examinations, including urine cultures, urinary system ultrasound and urodynamic tests, when necessary; the reasons for not having regular control visits were living distant from hospital (15.3%) and monetary problems (7.7%). Of the patients, 42.7% did not experience urinary tract infections (UTI), 36.4% had bacteriuria but no UTI episodes with fever, 15.9% had 1-2 clinical UTI episodes per year and 5% had X3 clinical UTIs. The clinical characteristics of patients with and without UTI (at least one symptomatic UTI during 1 year) were similar (P40.05). The frequency of symptomatic UTI was similar in patients using different bladder management techniques (P40.05).
Conclusion:The most frequently used technique for bladder rehabilitation in patients with SCI was IC (77.9%). In all, 63.2% of patients used anticholinergic drugs, oxybutynin being the most commonly used drug. Also, 77% of patients had regular control visits for neurogenic bladder; 42.7% did not experience any UTIs.
“…In uncomplicated UTI, E. coli (34.4-67.0%) was the most common pathogen, as shown in many studies, followed by Enterococcus, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter, Klebsiella species, and Staphylococcus [19][20][21]. On the contrary, urea splitting bacteria-i.e., P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella species, Providencia species, and Morganella species-are more common in most studies of UTI in patients with SCI or indwelling catheter [22][23][24]. In our study, urea splitting organisms were isolated in 57.9% of cultures, and the two major organisms were P. aeruginosa and Klebsiella species.…”
Purpose:To analyze the results of urine cultures and antimicrobial sensitivity tests according to the voiding methods in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) over a 15-year period. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,579 urine culture samples, obtained from January 2000 to December 2014, for 73 SCI patients were analyzed according to the voiding method. We analyzed the following: positive urine culture rate, colony counts, isolated number of organism, major organisms, and antimicrobial sensitivity tests. The voiding methods were categorized into four methods: clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), suprapubic catheterization (SPC), urethral Foley catheter, and spontaneous voiding (SV). Results: Among the 1,579 urine samples, 1,250 (79.2%) were positive. The CIC group showed the lowest rate of bacteriuria (p<0.001), colony counts (p<0.001), and polymicrobial infection (p<0.001). Causative organisms were mostly gram-negative bacteria (86.7%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.7%) was most common pathogen followed by Escherichia coli (22.3%), Klebsiella species (9.5%), Providencia species (4.4%), and Serratia marcescens (4.2%). Major pathogens and antimicrobial sensitivity tests were different according to the voiding method. Conclusions: CIC is the best voiding method to reduce urinary tract infection (UTI) in SCI patients. To treat UTI in in SCI patients, empirical antibiotics can be chosen according to the voiding method based on the reference of our study prior to the availability of antimicrobial sensitivity results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.