2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urdu handwritten text recognition: a survey

Abstract: Work on the problem of handwritten text recognition in Urdu script has been an active research area. A significant progress is made in this interesting and challenging field in the last few years. In this study, the authors presented a comprehensive survey for a number of offline and online handwritten text recognition systems for Urdu script written in Nastaliq font style from 2004 to 2019. Following features make their contribution worthwhile and unique among the reviews of a similar kind: (i) their review c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested DConvAEN-Net model scored 95.21% on BanglaLekha-Isolated for 84 classes, 92.40% on CMATERdb 3.1 for 238 classes, and 95.53% on Ekush for 122 classes using this supervised and unsupervised learning technique [34]. Husnain et al [35] performed a survey on off-line Urdu hand written text recognition. According to the [35], Urdu is derived from Arabic language and it is bidirectional and cursive in its nature so it (Urdu) has almost same challenges as Arabic have for recognition purpose but Urdu has higher complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The suggested DConvAEN-Net model scored 95.21% on BanglaLekha-Isolated for 84 classes, 92.40% on CMATERdb 3.1 for 238 classes, and 95.53% on Ekush for 122 classes using this supervised and unsupervised learning technique [34]. Husnain et al [35] performed a survey on off-line Urdu hand written text recognition. According to the [35], Urdu is derived from Arabic language and it is bidirectional and cursive in its nature so it (Urdu) has almost same challenges as Arabic have for recognition purpose but Urdu has higher complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Husnain et al [35] performed a survey on off-line Urdu hand written text recognition. According to the [35], Urdu is derived from Arabic language and it is bidirectional and cursive in its nature so it (Urdu) has almost same challenges as Arabic have for recognition purpose but Urdu has higher complexity. Authors presented survey of articles published from 2004-2019 with 04 levels which are: character, word, ligature, and sentence level [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors highlighted the issues of multilingual text and real-time performance of current systems [23]. Other recent surveys have analysed specific language-based techniques such as Urdu [24], but also omit information related to their implementation or their multiple configurations.…”
Section: Latest Surveys On Text Spottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the earlier section, there is a lack of an appropriate and concise data corpus containing Urdu handwritten characters and numerals to perform text recognition tasks at the character level. ere are some publicly available datasets of Urdu handwritten text like Urdu Nastaliq Handwritten Dataset (UNHD) (Ahmed et al [22]; Das et al [23]; Husnain et al [24]; Sagheer et al [25]), but unfortunately, the data sets have only the Urdu handwritten numerals. Furthermore, these instances are not enough to apply state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to get better results.…”
Section: Dataset Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%