Urban Systems of Accumulation: Half a Century of Chilean Neoliberal Urban Policies

Abstract

We analyse a half‐century of Chilean urban reforms to explain the introduction of a system of urban accumulation by dispossession of public resources and opportunities. Three stages have been conceptualised in the imposition of a neoliberal creative‐destructive process: proto‐neoliberalism, roll‐back and roll‐out periods. Empirical studies have traditionally analysed this process by examining a single urban policy's evolution over time. In this paper, we go beyond these types of studies by performing a systemic analysis of multiple urban policy reforms in Santiago, Chile. We use a genealogical thematic analysis to track changes in laws, government programmes and planning documents from between 1952 and 2014. Our analysis identifies different “urban systems of accumulation” by looking at the interplay of four urban policies: (1) urban planning deregulation; (2) social housing privatisation; (3) devolution of territorial taxes; and (4) decreased public service provision. Moreover, our multidimensional policy analysis in Santiago characterises a more radical, fourth expression in the creative destruction process of “accumulation by dismantling”. Consequently, we advocate for more multidimensional urban policy research that goes beyond a three‐period analysis in order to gain a deeper understanding of contemporary neoliberal creative‐destructive processes in variegated geographies.

Towards variegated ‘Peripheral Municipalisms’: The experience of Valparaíso and Recoleta, Chile

“…Chilean municipal autonomy, for example, has been rated as the lowest on the continent (Cravacuore, 2020). Furthermore, Navarrete-Hernández and Toro (2019) conclude that after 40 years of neoliberal urban reforms, a system of urban accumulation by dispossession has become consolidated in Santiago. While revenues and investment have been concentrated in the richer areas of the city, the lack of effective redistributive mechanisms and the dominant competitive logic have increased territorial inequality between wealthier and poorer municipalities.…”

“The rich will always be able to dispose of their waste”: a view from the frontlines of municipal failure in Makhanda, South Africa

“…state retreat orchestrated through the withdrawal of finances, staff, and ultimately services, spurred by a failure to increase resources to match growing demands, and growing private sector involvement in service provision. Neoliberal privatisation has been observed to degrade the quality of public services, especially in low-income areas (Navarrete-Hernandez & Toro, 2019 ), and work to the exclusion of those unable to pay, restricting access to formerly public goods and spaces (Smith, 2021 ). In addition, privatisation has been reported to produce negative impacts on environmental sustainability locally (Fasenfest, 2021 ; Homsy, 2020 ), but may result in improvements to public service work ethics (Maron, 2021 ).…”

The assemblages of (counter) spectacle – mega-retail in post-dictatorship Chile and beyond

“…Its awkward materiality on the Avenue may be easily overlooked, but this is a testament to the struggle over the production of urban space, or the “right to the city”. In fact, there is a clear geopolitics to this struggle, as some of the mall's opponents explained how their activities were constrained by the legacies of the military dictatorship that imposed neoliberalism and its deregulatory tendencies (Sabatini 2000; Navarrete-Hernandez and Toro 2019). Jorge explained exactly what the liberalization of the production of urban space refers to in the professional practice of architecture and urban planning:“The Architecture Association is a professional association that, before 1973 when the dictator Pinochet changed the registry law of professional associations, protected the ethics of architecture and urbanism in Chile.…”