2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban monitoring using multi-temporal SAR and multi-spectral data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available features were the seven Landsat bands, two SAR backscattering intensities (0-35 days), and the SAR interferometric coherence. We used all seven Landsat TM spectral bands and appended two SAR features: the computed coherence Co and a spatially filtered version of the coherence F Co, which was specially designed to increase the urban-area discrimination [17]. 2) FC1.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available features were the seven Landsat bands, two SAR backscattering intensities (0-35 days), and the SAR interferometric coherence. We used all seven Landsat TM spectral bands and appended two SAR features: the computed coherence Co and a spatially filtered version of the coherence F Co, which was specially designed to increase the urban-area discrimination [17]. 2) FC1.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For OC-SVM, we take the class 'urban' as the target class. The images used are from ERS2 SAR and Landsat TM sensors acquired in 1999 over the area of Naples, Italy [34]. The dataset have seven Landsat bands, two SAR backscattering intensities (0-35 days), and the SAR interferometric coherence.…”
Section: Experimental Results For Supervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents the experimental results of semisupervised methods in the same urban monitoring application presented in the previous section [34]. However, different sets of labeled and unlabeled training samples were used in order to test the performance of the SSL methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results For Semisupervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such trend favours development of novel image classification methods that can handle temporal data (Jianya et al, 2008). This is especially true for radar sensors which overcome limitations of optical sensors: their signals can penetrate clouds and are independent of daylight (Gomez-Chova et al, 2006;Tupin, 2010). Incorporating crop growing degree day information into multitemporal radar images from TerraSAR-X is likely to improve crop classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%