2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban land-use mapping using a deep convolutional neural network with high spatial resolution multispectral remote sensing imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
193
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 449 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
193
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the classification accuracy of the present study exceeded 80%, ours and the above studies are subject to limitations determined by the availability and resolution of remote imagery, as well as the presence of clouds and gaps, the difficulty in obtaining on-ground reference data, and time and cost constraints (Christiansen and Schöner 2004, Yan and Roy 2014, Zou et al 2017, Hao et al 2018, Hu and Hu, 2019. A variety of classification and analytical methods, including object-based systems (Arvor et al 2013), convolutional neural networks (Huang et al 2018), and reference time-series-based mapping (Hao et al 2018), have been devised to address these issues (Hansen and Loveland 2012). Difficulties in interpreting spectral signatures in Central Asia generally relate to the inability to distinguish cropland from shrubland, grassland, and/or bare areas (Hao et al 2018, Hu andHu 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although the classification accuracy of the present study exceeded 80%, ours and the above studies are subject to limitations determined by the availability and resolution of remote imagery, as well as the presence of clouds and gaps, the difficulty in obtaining on-ground reference data, and time and cost constraints (Christiansen and Schöner 2004, Yan and Roy 2014, Zou et al 2017, Hao et al 2018, Hu and Hu, 2019. A variety of classification and analytical methods, including object-based systems (Arvor et al 2013), convolutional neural networks (Huang et al 2018), and reference time-series-based mapping (Hao et al 2018), have been devised to address these issues (Hansen and Loveland 2012). Difficulties in interpreting spectral signatures in Central Asia generally relate to the inability to distinguish cropland from shrubland, grassland, and/or bare areas (Hao et al 2018, Hu andHu 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The class accuracies are shown in Figure 8; averaged OA and AA values are given in Table 1. By comparing our multimodal model against the unimodal variants, we observe an increase of around 6% for OA and more than 7% for AA against the VGG16-based model trained on overhead imagery, while Specifically, AlexNet [49] that was used in [50] to perform landuse mapping with mutltispectral remote sensing images and ResNet50 [51] that was used in [52] to do large-scale land cover classification of satellite imagery. The results of these methods are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Joint Cnn Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many supervised algorithms have been proposed to accurately discriminate land cover classes in remote sensing images, including support vector machines, random forests, and neural networks [1]- [6]. Recently, deep learning, particularly deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has achieved considerable progress in remote sensing image classification, including hyperspectral image classification, and has achieved state-of-the-art results [7]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%