2017
DOI: 10.2495/ha-v1-n1-60-67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban heritage of kabul and post-war recovery efforts

Abstract: The 30 years of tragic war that was imposed on Afghanistan has dealt a severe and destructive blow to the physical and social fabric of its cities. The regrettable victims in this conflict, however, that were entrapped are the historic cities where fierce street-to-street fighting inflicted utter destruction of some of the most valuable historic and residential buildings. Like many important urban and architectural heritage in the Islamic cities, historic Kabul evolved through continual cultural participation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the literature on urban heritage and its role in post-war recovery and resilience highlight the huge potential of heritage in providing sustainable economic and social futures. The significance of utilizing local knowledge and skills in traditional construction [1], enabling local communities to negotiate among themselves their recovery priorities [2], while providing training on traditional building conservation and maintenance [3], has been stressed as key elements for the future sustainability of the physical and social fabric of post-war cities. However, what is lacking in the current literature is more knowledge about the role of urban heritage as a negotiation and reconciliation medium [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature on urban heritage and its role in post-war recovery and resilience highlight the huge potential of heritage in providing sustainable economic and social futures. The significance of utilizing local knowledge and skills in traditional construction [1], enabling local communities to negotiate among themselves their recovery priorities [2], while providing training on traditional building conservation and maintenance [3], has been stressed as key elements for the future sustainability of the physical and social fabric of post-war cities. However, what is lacking in the current literature is more knowledge about the role of urban heritage as a negotiation and reconciliation medium [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%