2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban green space accessibility changes in a high-density city: A case study of Macau from 2010 to 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Green Space Proximity Table 4 shows that the vast majority of studies found that high-SES people live in closer proximity to parks than low-SES people (inequity, 74%, n = 20), followed by studies uncovering mixed or non-significant findings (19%, n = 5) and studies highlighting that low-SES people are advantaged (equity, 7%, n = 2). Regarding race-ethnicity, one study found that ethnically advantaged groups in Macau, China live closer to parks [103], while another uncovered mixed findings for Santa Cruz, Bolivia [47]. When classifying findings based on the thresholds used to measure proximity, we found consistently inequitable results among studies that used no thresholds (79%, n = 11), thresholds between 501 and 1000 m (75%, n = 3), and thresholds above 1000 m (100%, n = 3).…”
Section: Results: Do Inequities In the Global South Reflect Those In mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Green Space Proximity Table 4 shows that the vast majority of studies found that high-SES people live in closer proximity to parks than low-SES people (inequity, 74%, n = 20), followed by studies uncovering mixed or non-significant findings (19%, n = 5) and studies highlighting that low-SES people are advantaged (equity, 7%, n = 2). Regarding race-ethnicity, one study found that ethnically advantaged groups in Macau, China live closer to parks [103], while another uncovered mixed findings for Santa Cruz, Bolivia [47]. When classifying findings based on the thresholds used to measure proximity, we found consistently inequitable results among studies that used no thresholds (79%, n = 11), thresholds between 501 and 1000 m (75%, n = 3), and thresholds above 1000 m (100%, n = 3).…”
Section: Results: Do Inequities In the Global South Reflect Those In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies exemplify the trends displayed in Tables 4-7. For proximity, studies in six Chinese cities (e.g., Shanghai, Beijing, Zhongshan, Shenzhen, Wuhan, Macau) showed that high-SES people tend to live closer to urban green spaces than low-SES people, with effect sizes ranging from large to very small [74,81,82,91,92,94,95,97,98,100,101,103,104]. Depending on the methods and sample size, studies focusing on the same city found contrasting results.…”
Section: Results: Do Inequities In the Global South Vary Based On Geomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The positive effects of open green areas on human are known by everyone. However urban green spaces are important for urban residents' well-being, especially in these dense urban areas [2] . Urban dwellers have become aggressive, miserable and introvert by losing their natural behaviors as a result of separation of human beings from their natural environment and atrophy of their sense of belonging to nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%