2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54430-4_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Air Quality Forecasting: A Regression and a Classification Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RF algorithm can be ranked as 2nd, achieving correlation coefficients very close to the ones received with the aid of LR (and surpassing it for the Eptapyrgiou station), while in some cases leading to the best (lower) MAE (like in the AM3, Martiou and Eptapyrgiou stations) and to the best (lower) RMSE (like in the AM3 and in the Eptapyrgiou stations). LR is a simple algorithm of linear logic generally considered weak in depicting nonlinear phenomena like the ones involved in AQ problems, and usually performing more poorly when compared with algorithms like ANNs or RF [1]. The success of the specific algorithm in our case has to do with the limited number of atmospheric quality parameters being available in all studied areas and stations (low number of features), thus leading to the (possible) exclusion of nonlinear dependencies from the available dataset, and dictating persistence as the main mechanism affecting the forecast of PM 10 levels one day in advance [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The RF algorithm can be ranked as 2nd, achieving correlation coefficients very close to the ones received with the aid of LR (and surpassing it for the Eptapyrgiou station), while in some cases leading to the best (lower) MAE (like in the AM3, Martiou and Eptapyrgiou stations) and to the best (lower) RMSE (like in the AM3 and in the Eptapyrgiou stations). LR is a simple algorithm of linear logic generally considered weak in depicting nonlinear phenomena like the ones involved in AQ problems, and usually performing more poorly when compared with algorithms like ANNs or RF [1]. The success of the specific algorithm in our case has to do with the limited number of atmospheric quality parameters being available in all studied areas and stations (low number of features), thus leading to the (possible) exclusion of nonlinear dependencies from the available dataset, and dictating persistence as the main mechanism affecting the forecast of PM 10 levels one day in advance [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where J T is the (transposed) Jacobian and e(t) is the overall error vector [1]. In this specific case a MultiLayer Perceptron Network with a feed-forward architecture and a back propagation training method was used, with an input layer consisting 5 nodes (i.e.…”
Section: Algorithms For Single Station Model Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations