Uranium(VI) extraction from chloride solution with benzyloctadecyldimethyl ammonium chloride (BODMAC) in a liquid membrane process

Jian-pin, Guo; Sun, Xuan; Du, Dong-li; Wu, Xi; Li, Mingxia; Hua, Peng; Sun, Shenglei; Wang, Aihua

doi:10.1007/s10967-007-7008-3

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Literature is available on impact of various parameters like ligand concentration, acid concentration in feed phase, viscosity of membrane, etc. on LEM extraction of U(VI) by TOPO [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Also literature is available on extraction of U(VI) by the ligands ( D2EHPA, TOPO and TOA ) using bulk liquid membrane (BLM), SLM and liquid-liquid extraction [19][20][21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of extraction of U(VI) by liquid emulsion membrane (LEM) using TOPO, D2EHPA and TOA

Das

Juvekar

Bhattacharya

2015

J Radioanal Nucl Chem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response surface methodology is used to obtain optimal rate and extent of extraction of low concentration U(VI) (B100 mg/L) by liquid emulsion membrane technique. Three different ligands viz. Tri-n-octyl phosphine oxide (TOPO), Tri-n-octyl amine (TOA) and Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA), are used. 2 3 factorial design is applied to generate second order regression equation for studying the effect of concentration of ligand, surfactant and feed acidity. The regression model is in good agreement with the experimental data for all ligands. The rate of extraction of U(VI) by LEM is found to be in the order TOA [ TOPO [ D2EHPA.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of extraction of U(VI) by liquid emulsion membrane (LEM) using TOPO, D2EHPA and TOA

Das

Juvekar

Bhattacharya

2015

J Radioanal Nucl Chem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Critical review on recent developments in solventless techniques for extraction of analytes

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most recent contributions on solventless extraction techniques have been reviewed. This paper deals with those techniques that use solid phases, such as solid-phase microextraction, liquid phases, such as single-drop microextraction and hollow-fibre liquid-phase microextraction, and subcritical fluids, such as subcritical water extraction. In all cases, the most recent publications have been critically studied. Direct extraction and derivatization processes to facilitate the extraction of analytes in different areas have been included. Hyphenated approaches, if available, are also included in this review. Comparison of techniques organized by analytes and matrices also enhances this critical overview of solventless techniques.

show abstract

2.14 Liquid Membranes

Hao

Ho³

et al. 2017

Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Uranium(VI) extraction from chloride solution with benzyloctadecyldimethyl ammonium chloride (BODMAC) in a liquid membrane process

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Efficacy of extraction of U(VI) by liquid emulsion membrane (LEM) using TOPO, D2EHPA and TOA

Efficacy of extraction of U(VI) by liquid emulsion membrane (LEM) using TOPO, D2EHPA and TOA

Critical review on recent developments in solventless techniques for extraction of analytes

2.14 Liquid Membranes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About