2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranium toxicity to aquatic invertebrates: A laboratory assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this data, some of the sampled streams from which H. lugdunensis strains were obtained are slightly polluted (0.35 -6.35 µg/l). Moreover, Bergmann et al (2018) reported that 95 % of the 298 sites receiving waters from deactivated uranium mines in Portugal had < 10 µg/l, while 1.3 % had > 100 µg/l, and 0.33 % > 1000 µg/l. Our findings indicate that some of those streams may exhibit ecological impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to this data, some of the sampled streams from which H. lugdunensis strains were obtained are slightly polluted (0.35 -6.35 µg/l). Moreover, Bergmann et al (2018) reported that 95 % of the 298 sites receiving waters from deactivated uranium mines in Portugal had < 10 µg/l, while 1.3 % had > 100 µg/l, and 0.33 % > 1000 µg/l. Our findings indicate that some of those streams may exhibit ecological impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual was suspended in 7 mL of 0.005 % nitric acid. Uranium was measured by fluorescence (Bergmann et al, 2018); 0.50 mL of sample was diluted in 5.0 ml of distilled water and 0.50 ml of the polysilicate solution. Fluorescence was compared to standard curves (2; 10; 100 and 1000 µg/l (Van Loon & Barefoot, 1989) at λ = 530 nm (Fluorat 02-2M, Lumex).…”
Section: Uranium Adsorption By Leaf Discsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, neither partitioning of U to food nor feeding rates were measured. In contrast, the study by Bergmann et al indicated that both food and water contributed to U concentrations in the caddisfly Schizopelex festiva. However, specimens were not depurated before U analysis, leaving open the possibility that the gut content contributed to the measured U body burdens .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the case of uranium (U), a metal used worldwide as an energy source, little is known about the exposure pathways and mechanisms governing its bioaccumulation, especially in aquatic insects. With some exceptions, most of the existing literature reports effects of aqueous U exposure on noninsect aquatic invertebrates and algae and highlights the influence of water chemistry (i.e., pH, alkalinity, hardness, dissolved organic matter) on U bioavailability and toxicity. Speciation modeling has revealed that the free uranyl ion (UO 2 2+ ) is not always the best predictor of biological responses after dissolved U exposures, departing from the free-ion activity postulate . For example, uranium–carbonate complexes (namely, UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 2– and (UO 2 ) 3 (CO 3 ) 6 6– ) best predicted U uptake rates in the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis, implying that the aqueous uptake of U, at least for this species, is expected in natural waters dominated by binary uranyl carbonate species (i.e., pH ranging from 5 to 7, low hardness, very low natural organic matter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%