2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps202125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake of phytodetritus by three ostracod species from the Baltic Sea: effects of amphipod disturbance and ostracod density

Abstract: Three species of ostracods (Candona neglecta, Paracyprideis fennica and Heterocyprideis sorbyana) are common in the Baltic proper and often contribute more to the total meiobenthic biomass than any other taxon. An earlier experiment has shown that C. neglecta assimilates more labelled diatoms (Skeletonema costatum) than any other meiobenthic species, and 10 and 100 times more than the other 2 ostracod species, respectively. The uptake of phytodetritus by the 3 ostracod species was investigated in 2 separate ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ostracods) as keystone species on production and community metabolism of micro-or mesocosm freshwater beds, playing an interesting role in determining the structure of these systems (Lawrence et al 2002). In these microenvironments, ostracods compete with oligochaetes and amphipods for food sources (Modig et al 2000) and all these groups are predated by fishes or gastropods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ostracods) as keystone species on production and community metabolism of micro-or mesocosm freshwater beds, playing an interesting role in determining the structure of these systems (Lawrence et al 2002). In these microenvironments, ostracods compete with oligochaetes and amphipods for food sources (Modig et al 2000) and all these groups are predated by fishes or gastropods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many aspects of the ecology of these amphipods have been studied, including food and feeding activity (Hill & Elmgren 1987, Lopez & Elmgren 1989, Johnson & Wiederholm 1992, Lehtonen 1994), predation (Abrams et al 1990, Sparrevik & Leonardsson 1995, interactions between year classes (Hill 1992), and interactions with meiobenthos (Ólafs-son & Elmgren 1991, Modig et al 2000. M. affinis and P. femorata are morphologically similar, but there are important ecological differences between the 2 species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bloom (Limén and Ó lafsson 2002). These earlier studies proposed that this niche differentiation can be explained by vertical stratification in the first centimeter of the sediment and/or resource partitioning among these three species with regard to carbon pathways, with C. neglecta relying more on freshly deposited phytodetritus, while H. sorbyana and P. fennica mainly consume older, more refractory material (Ó lafsson et al 1999;Modig et al 2000). C. neglecta has been thought to have a relatively short life cycle when compared to H. sorbyana and P. fennica (Ankar and Elmgren 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%