2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Extremity Functional Evaluation by Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scoring Using Depth-Sensing Camera in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

Abstract: Virtual home-based rehabilitation is an emerging area in stroke rehabilitation. Functional assessment tools are essential to monitor recovery and provide current function-based rehabilitation. We developed the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) tool using Kinect (Microsoft, USA) and validated it for hemiplegic stroke patients. Forty-one patients with hemiplegic stroke were enrolled. Thirteen of 33 items were selected for upper extremity motor FMA. One occupational therapist assessed the motor FMA while recording uppe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale is a validated tool widely used for motor function assessment in patients with stroke. 33 As a continuous outcome measure, it has good correlation with the changes in motor impairment. 34 The motor score in this scale ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 100 points (normal motor performance), divided into 66 points for upper extremity and 34 points for the lower extremity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale is a validated tool widely used for motor function assessment in patients with stroke. 33 As a continuous outcome measure, it has good correlation with the changes in motor impairment. 34 The motor score in this scale ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 100 points (normal motor performance), divided into 66 points for upper extremity and 34 points for the lower extremity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the assessment method with references [30] and [37], it could be seen that the TCNN method is more appropriate and convenient than the evaluation method in reference [30], which found a strong linear relationship between qualitative scores and quantitative scores derived from both standard and low-cost motion capture. The TCNN model accuracy is higher than the PCA-ANN (Principal Component Analysis-Artificial Neural Networks) model accuracy in reference [37], which ranged from 65% to 87% [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several efforts have been made towards providing an automatic solution to this problem [12], [20], [21] but thus far the reported success rates (maximum reported accuracy: 87.3%) [30], translating into 44.65 correspondence with clinician opinion) are insufficient to guarantee wide clinical acceptance. Our hypothesis in this regard is that if we can increase classification rates of motor dexterity exercises by capitalizing on information shared among classes, then the technology will come closer to acceptance by clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%