2018
DOI: 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on the ichthyofauna of the Piquiri River basin, Paraná, Brazil: a conservation priority area

Abstract: Knowledge of the fish species in river basins is among the minimum requirements for the management of water and fish resources. Therefore, the aim of this study was to update the fish species composition of the Piquiri River basin, upper Paraná River basin. Data were gathered from recent information published in specialized literature and records for ichthyology collections. This update reports the occurrence of 152 fish species distributed in 8 orders, 31 families, and 89 genera. Non-native species accounted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, members of the orders Siluriformes and Characiformes comprise the majority of species found in the three sampled streams of the Rio Sapucaí basin (see Figure 3). Dozens of investigators who have conducted fish surveys of rivers, reservoirs, or streams of the upper Paraná basin (e.g., Casatti et al 2003, Fagundes et al 2015, Frota et al 2016, Cavalli et al 2018 have also found species richness to be highest in these orders. Therefore, the relatively high species counts in these two orders, as we found in this study, is an expected result for many regions of the upper Rio Paraná system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, members of the orders Siluriformes and Characiformes comprise the majority of species found in the three sampled streams of the Rio Sapucaí basin (see Figure 3). Dozens of investigators who have conducted fish surveys of rivers, reservoirs, or streams of the upper Paraná basin (e.g., Casatti et al 2003, Fagundes et al 2015, Frota et al 2016, Cavalli et al 2018 have also found species richness to be highest in these orders. Therefore, the relatively high species counts in these two orders, as we found in this study, is an expected result for many regions of the upper Rio Paraná system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these projects focused mostly on larger rivers and, until recently, low-order streams (especially in the Paraná State) still lacked samplings. This scenario changed in recent years as researchers started to focus ecological and biogeographical aspects of several sub-basins of the alto rio Paraná system, increasing our knowledge about the fish species resident in its streams (e.g., Castro et al 2003;Cetra et al 2012;Cionek et al 2012;Pagotto et al 2012;Costa et al 2013;Hoffmann et al 2015;Cetra et al 2016;Frota et al 2016a,b;Larentis et al 2016;Cavalli et al 2018;Delariva et al 2018;Claro-García et al 2018;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, knowledge of the actual quantity of species and their geographical distribution is far from complete (Ota et al 2015). Specifically to the Paraná State, where are numerous river networks, recent inventories of fish (Baumgartner et al 2012;Pagotto et al 2012;Frota et al 2016a;Cavalli et al 2018) have been improving the knowledge about the state's large sub-basins, yet economically biased by hydroelectric projects financing. Headwater regions of the rivers, with lower profitability of the electric sector, remain without substantial samplings, even though they have a high rate of endemism and are ecologically threated by human occupation (Baumgartner et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%