2017
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2017.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update of the GJB2/DFNB1 mutation spectrum in Russia: a founder Ingush mutation del(GJB2-D13S175) is the most frequent among other large deletions

Abstract: Although mutations in the GJB2 gene sequence make up the majority of variants causing autosomal-recessive non-syndromic hearing loss, few large deletions have been shown to contribute to DFNB1 deafness. Currently, genetic testing for DFNB1 hearing loss includes GJB2 sequencing and DFNB1 deletion analysis for two common large deletions, del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854). Here, we report frequency in Russia, clinical significance and evolutionary origins of a 101 kb deletion, del(GJB2-D13S175), recently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…About 200 GJB2 mutations have been reported to cause DFNB1 HI 2 (Stenson et al, 2017 ). They can be classified into many different types: large deletions that remove the whole GJB2 gene (Feldmann et al, 2009 ; Bliznetz et al, 2014 , 2017 ), large deletions that remove regulatory sequences that are needed for the expression of GJB2 but keep the gene intact (del Castillo et al, 2002 , 2005 ; Wilch et al, 2010 ; Tayoun et al, 2016 ; Table 1 ), and a plethora of small-scale alterations, including nonsense, missense and splice-site point mutations, as well as frameshifting small insertions and deletions (del Castillo and del Castillo, 2011 ). The frequencies of these mutations are diverse, with different mutant alleles overrepresented in different populations.…”
Section: Genetic Alterations That Results In Dfnb1 Hearing Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 200 GJB2 mutations have been reported to cause DFNB1 HI 2 (Stenson et al, 2017 ). They can be classified into many different types: large deletions that remove the whole GJB2 gene (Feldmann et al, 2009 ; Bliznetz et al, 2014 , 2017 ), large deletions that remove regulatory sequences that are needed for the expression of GJB2 but keep the gene intact (del Castillo et al, 2002 , 2005 ; Wilch et al, 2010 ; Tayoun et al, 2016 ; Table 1 ), and a plethora of small-scale alterations, including nonsense, missense and splice-site point mutations, as well as frameshifting small insertions and deletions (del Castillo and del Castillo, 2011 ). The frequencies of these mutations are diverse, with different mutant alleles overrepresented in different populations.…”
Section: Genetic Alterations That Results In Dfnb1 Hearing Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The c.35delG predominance in deaf patients was reported in several studies conducted in the European part of Russia [ 30 – 38 ]. In the ethnically heterogeneous population of Siberia, epidemiological and molecular genetic studies of hereditary deafness are currently limited to regions of the Altai Republic, the Tuva Republic (Southern Siberia), and the Sakha Republic (Yakutia, Eastern Siberia) [ 39 – 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Ñðåäè âñåõ îáñëåäîâàííûõ ìî-íîýòíè÷íûõ ãðóïï ìîíãîëû îêàçàëèñü â íàèìåíüøåé ñòåïåíè ñêëîííû ê îaeèðåíèþ, äåòåðìèíèðîâàííîìó FTO, ÷òî õîðîøî ñîãëàñóåòñÿ ñ äàííûìè ïîëó÷åííûìè â ìàñøòàáíîì èññëåäîâàíèè Ìàî ñ êîëëåãàìè, ïîêàçàâøèìè, ÷òî ãåíîôîíäû ïîïóëÿöèè Âîñòî÷íîé Àçèè (Êèòàé, Ìîíãîëèÿ, Êîðåÿ è ßïîíèÿ) îáåäíåíû àëëåëÿìè ðèñêà îaeèðåíèÿ è íàñûùåííû ïðîòåêöèîííûìè àëëåëÿìè [Mao et al, 2017]. Ðóññêèå, îáñëåäîâàííûå â ðàìêàõ äàííîé ðàáîòû, ïðîaeèâàþò ïîñòîÿííî èëè íà ïðîòÿaeåíèè äëèòåëüíîãî âðåìåíè â Ìîñêâå, ÷òî, â èçâåñòíîé ñòåïåíè, îãðàíè÷èâàåò ðåïðåçåíòàòèâíîñòü äàííîé ãðóïïû [Bliznetz et al, 2017]. Ðàíåå, â ðàìêàõ èçó÷åíèÿ àññîöèàöèé Ò/À-ïîëèìîðôèçìà ñî ñêëîííîñòüþ ê íàáîðó âåñà, íàìè áûëè îáñëåäîâàíû ýòíè÷åñêèå Òàáëèöà 3.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified