Upaya Hukum Yang Dilakukan Korban Kejahatan Dikaji Dari Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Ri

Abstract

Positive Legal Indonesia provides protection against crime victims who are not directly in the Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, as well as outside the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code. Later in the Code of Criminal Procedure formulatif policies and by laws to understanding the victim used different terminology, namely the complainant, the complainant, witnesses, interested third parties and the injured party. In practice, the request made by the applicant with the PK as the quality of the witnesses, interested third parties, the Legal Adviser or by the Public Prosecutor and apparently only remedy reconsideration made by the Public Prosecutor and Third Party concerned (Judicial Review Decision No. 4 PK / PID/2000 November 28 2001), which was granted by the Supreme Court while the petition for judicial review filed applicant witnesses (Judicial Review Decision No. 11 PK/PID/2003 August 6, 2003), or the reporting witness stated by the Supreme Court was not accepted by because the applicant is not qualified to appeal judicial review. From the theoretical dimension turns doing different interpretations of the Supreme Court as provided Art. 263 paragraph (1) Criminal Procedure Code that the applicant is granted a judicial review conducted by the Public Prosecutor and the Third Party concerned on the one hand while on the other side of the applicant's application for judicial review of quality reporting victims or witnesses can not be accepted. Keywords: remedies, victims of crime, judicial review

Penyuapan Terhadap Pejabat Negara Diluar Kewenangannya: Kasus Bupati Labuhan Batu Utara

“…Selain itu juga Penuntut Umum ragu terhadap peraturan hukum pidana mana yang akan diterapkan hakim atas perbuatan yang menurut pertimbangan telah nyata terbukti. Pada dakwaan alternatif, hakim bisa langsung memilih untuk menentukan dakwaan mana yang sesuai atau cocok dengan fakta-fakta di persidangan (Mulyadi, 2002).…”

Strengthening the Function of Prejudicial Institutions and the Implementation Concept of the Judges Institution of Commissioners in the Protection of Suspects Rights

“…Protection of crime victims is abstract protection or indirect protection which is formulated in a formulaic policy, namely abstract protection that tends to lead to the protection of society and individuals. Attention to protection tends to be on the perpetrator, even though the victim of crime according to Sthepen Schafer is said to be the Cinderella of criminal law [20]. The protection of crime victims in pretrial institutions is only related to the provisions in Article 80 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which states that a request to examine whether or not the termination of an investigation or prosecution is legal can be submitted by an investigator or public prosecutor.…”

The Role of Forensic Laboratories in Proving Poison Murders in Indonesia

“…A judge will then conduct the examination and make the decision in court. The judge then decides whether or not a suspect is at fault, based on the evidence and instructions, and whether or not an act has been charged against the suspect (Hamzah, 2016;Mulyadi, 2012). The greater the amount of evidence presented, the more material truth will be guaranteed.…”