“…The quasars presented in Bañados et al (2016) nearly doubled the number of z > 5.6 quasars known at the time, enabling a transition from studies of individual sources to statistical analyses of the quasar population in early cosmic times. For example, the much enlarged quasar sample enabled (i) the measurement of the nuclear chemical enrichment, black hole mass, and Eddington ratio distributions (e.g., Schindler et al 2020;Farina et al 2022;Lai et al 2022;Wang et al 2022), (ii) the characterization of their X-ray (e.g., Vito et al 2019) and radio (e.g., Liu et al 2021) properties, (iii) the search for signatures of outflows and black hole feedback (e.g., Meyer et al 2019;Novak et al 2020;Bischetti et al 2022), (iv) a census of (atomic/molecular) gas and dust in the quasar hosts (e.g., Decarli et al 2018;Venemans et al 2018;Li et al 2020;Pensabene et al 2021;Decarli et al 2022), including the serendipitous discovery of star-forming companion galaxies (Decarli et al 2017), (v) the search for extended Lyα nebular emission (e.g., Farina et al 2019) and its connection to [C II] gas (Drake et al 2022), (vi) the quantification of the properties of water reservoirs in these quasars (e.g., Pensabene et al 2022), (vii) the identification of a population of particularly young quasars (Eilers et al 2020), (viii) the first constraints on quasar clustering at z ∼ 6 (Greiner et al 2021), (ix) the study of the environments in which these quasars reside (e.g., Mazzucchelli et al 2017a;Farina et al 2017;Meyer et al 2020Meyer et al , 2022, (x) the study of heavy elements in intervening absorption systems at z > 5 (e.g., Chen et al 2017;Cooper et al 2019), (xi) quantitative constraints on the thermal state of the intergalactic medium at z > 5 (e.g., Gaikwad et al 2020), and (xii) constraints on the end phases of cosmic reionization (e.g., Bosman et al 2022). In addition to these populat...…”