2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The X–shooter/ALMA Sample of Quasars in the Epoch of Reionization. II. Black Hole Masses, Eddington Ratios, and the Formation of the First Quasars

Abstract: We present measurements of black hole masses and Eddington ratios (λ Edd) for a sample of 38 bright (M 1450 < −24.4 mag) quasars at 5.8 ≲ z ≲ 7.5, derived from Very Large Telescope/X–shooter near–IR spectroscopy of their broad C iv and Mg ii emission lines. The black hole masses (on average, M BH ∼ 4.6 × 109 M ⊙) and accretion rates (0.1 ≲ λ Edd ≲ 1.0) are broadly consistent with that of similarly lu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 351 publications
(475 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For illustration purposes, we scale the normalization of the ERDFs with the luminosity cuts, multiplied by a factor of 5 and 30, respectively. The Eddington ratio for the whole sample follows a Schechter shape with a majority of inactive quasars, while the observed Eddington ratio is biased toward higher values and the distribution results in a lognormal shape, consistent with that of the brightest quasars at z ∼ 6 (e.g., Willott et al 2010b;Shen et al 2019;Yang et al 2021;Farina et al 2022). The lognormal shape still holds with the lower luminosity cut, but a lower luminosity threshold allows us to unveil more hidden quasars with low Eddington ratios.…”
Section: The Distribution Of the Eddington Ratio: Observed Versus Und...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For illustration purposes, we scale the normalization of the ERDFs with the luminosity cuts, multiplied by a factor of 5 and 30, respectively. The Eddington ratio for the whole sample follows a Schechter shape with a majority of inactive quasars, while the observed Eddington ratio is biased toward higher values and the distribution results in a lognormal shape, consistent with that of the brightest quasars at z ∼ 6 (e.g., Willott et al 2010b;Shen et al 2019;Yang et al 2021;Farina et al 2022). The lognormal shape still holds with the lower luminosity cut, but a lower luminosity threshold allows us to unveil more hidden quasars with low Eddington ratios.…”
Section: The Distribution Of the Eddington Ratio: Observed Versus Und...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Observations of luminous z  6.5 quasars have revealed the existence of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their massive host galaxies in the reionization epoch. The measurements of high-redshift quasar BH masses suggest that 10 8-9 solar-mass SMBHs existed as early as 700 million yr after the Big Bang, challenging models of early SMBH growth and BH seed formation (e.g., Bañados et al 2018;Yang et al 2020;Wang et al 2021;Yang et al 2021;Farina et al 2022). Measuring BH masses accurately is the key step required to characterize the growth and evolution of early SMBHs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the measurements of SMBHs in quasars at z > 4 are mainly based on broad emission lines in the rest-frame UV (e.g., C IV λ1549 and Mg II λ2800). The Mg IIbased BH mass estimators are widely used for the measurements of reionization-era SMBHs (e.g., Shen et al 2019;Yang et al 2021;Farina et al 2022). However, the study of quasar BH masses at low redshift via RM and the comparison between multiple single-epoch BH mass estimators have established the Hβ line as the most reliable tracer among quasar UV/optical emission lines (e.g., Shen 2013; Wang et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of CO and other molecules, such as hydrogen cyanide (HCN), in the discs of high-z galaxies offer exciting pathways to witness further the growth of black holes and the metamorphosis of their host galaxies (e.g. Riechers 2007;Kakkad et al 2017;Farina et al 2022;Tripodi et al 2022, and references therein). Awareness of the morphology-dependent black hole scaling relations will be necessary for the comparison with local galaxies and interpretation.…”
Section: Alma's Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%