2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling the effect of transport infrastructure and technological innovation on economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feedback hypothesis supported by many studies, e.g., Gyimah et al (2022) for Ghana, Shahbaz et al (2022) for China, Shabani et al (2022) for ECO member countries, Okumus, Guzel and Destek (2021) for Khan I et al (2022) for South Asian countries, Destek (2015) for Türkiye. Studies that highlight support for conservative assumptions include Wang and Lee (2022) for China, Usman et al (2022) For eight Arctic countries, Xue et al (2022) for French and Acheampong et al (2022) for the European Union. However, studies exposed to the neutrality hypothesis are Amin and Song (2022) for South and East Asian countries, Xu et al (2022) for China, Hossein et al (2022) for India, Khan M. B et al (2022) for G-7 economies, Destek and Aslan (2017) for Colombia and Thailand.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback hypothesis supported by many studies, e.g., Gyimah et al (2022) for Ghana, Shahbaz et al (2022) for China, Shabani et al (2022) for ECO member countries, Okumus, Guzel and Destek (2021) for Khan I et al (2022) for South Asian countries, Destek (2015) for Türkiye. Studies that highlight support for conservative assumptions include Wang and Lee (2022) for China, Usman et al (2022) For eight Arctic countries, Xue et al (2022) for French and Acheampong et al (2022) for the European Union. However, studies exposed to the neutrality hypothesis are Amin and Song (2022) for South and East Asian countries, Xu et al (2022) for China, Hossein et al (2022) for India, Khan M. B et al (2022) for G-7 economies, Destek and Aslan (2017) for Colombia and Thailand.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the majority of emerging nations are producers of nonrenewable resources, such as fossil fuels, the adverse impact of economic expansion on environmental quality prompts us to think about the key factors influencing economic growth in Brazil. Several studies, including Adedoyin et al (2021), Acheampong et al (2022), Chen et al (2019) and Destek and Sinha (2020) reported similar result.…”
Section: Results Of Dynamic Ardlsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…First, most growth theories emphasize the importance of technological advancements in breaking through growth constraints. Examples include the technical advancements made by New Growth and Neoclassical theorists, as well as the technological interference seen in the Malthusian theory of population growth (Acheampong et al, 2022). The demanding problems provided by growth to the ecosystem are extrapolated from the intervening roles of technology in addressing concerns surrounding growth theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main ways in which government subsidies for business innovation are beneficial. Government subsidies, on the one hand, encourage businesses to increase their investment in technological innovation while lowering the cost of technological innovation (Pan et al, 2021 ; Acheampong et al, 2022 ; Wang and Zheng, 2022 ; Zahoor et al, 2022 ). Due to the significant sunk costs associated with innovation and the unpredictability of the results, some businesses choose not to pursue it (Vértesy, 2017 ; Mezzanotti and Simcoe, 2019 ; Lin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%