1948
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(48)90225-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual case of ameloblastoma of mandible resection followed by restoration of continuity by iliac bone graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CEOT has been reported under a variety of different terms such as “Adamantoblastoma,[1]” “unusual Ameloblastoma,”[23] and “Cystic complex odontoma.”[24] CEOT or Pindborg tumor accounts for less than 3% of all the odontogenic tumors. The tumor frequently affects adults with equal distribution between men and women in an age range of 20–60 years, with a peak of incidence between 40 and 60 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEOT has been reported under a variety of different terms such as “Adamantoblastoma,[1]” “unusual Ameloblastoma,”[23] and “Cystic complex odontoma.”[24] CEOT or Pindborg tumor accounts for less than 3% of all the odontogenic tumors. The tumor frequently affects adults with equal distribution between men and women in an age range of 20–60 years, with a peak of incidence between 40 and 60 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It presents with no radiographic changes to a superficial erosive pattern. [ 14 21 ] to a radiolucency with scattered radiopaque foci. [ 7 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an extremely rare tumour, four cases of which had been described before 1958, diagnosed variously as adenoid adamantoblastoma (Thoma and Goldman, 1946), ameloblastoma of unusual type with calcification (Ivy, 1948), malignant odontoma (Wunderer, 1953), and cystic complex odontoma (Stoopack, 1957). Since 1958 a further two cases have been recorded (Chaudhry, Holte, and Vickers, 1962;Lucas, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%