2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14184449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Radar Target Detection under Complex Clutter Background Based on Mixture Variational Autoencoder

Abstract: The clutter background in modern radar target detection is complex and changeable. The performance of classical detectors based on parametric statistical modeling methods is often degraded due to model mismatch. Existing data-driven deep learning methods require cumbersome and expensive annotations. Furthermore, the performance of the detection network is severely degraded when the detection scene changes, since the trained network with the data from one scene is not suitable for another scene with different d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the normalized Doppler frequency of Clutter II is about 0.22, all methods suffer detection performance degradation for targets whose normalized Doppler frequency is close to the normalized Doppler frequency of Clutter II. Additionally, MTI-MTD also experiences a loss in detection performance for targets with Doppler close to zero, attributed to the presence of the extremely deep notch near zero frequency [27]. To further explore the detection performance of the proposed method for targets with velocities close to the clutter, we show the PD curves of all the methods for targets with normalized Doppler frequencies of 0.22 and 0.25 in Figure 8b and Figure 8c, respectively.…”
Section: Detection Performance For Targets Under a Dynamic Clutter Ba...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the normalized Doppler frequency of Clutter II is about 0.22, all methods suffer detection performance degradation for targets whose normalized Doppler frequency is close to the normalized Doppler frequency of Clutter II. Additionally, MTI-MTD also experiences a loss in detection performance for targets with Doppler close to zero, attributed to the presence of the extremely deep notch near zero frequency [27]. To further explore the detection performance of the proposed method for targets with velocities close to the clutter, we show the PD curves of all the methods for targets with normalized Doppler frequencies of 0.22 and 0.25 in Figure 8b and Figure 8c, respectively.…”
Section: Detection Performance For Targets Under a Dynamic Clutter Ba...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, supervised approaches cast RTD as a classification problem and train a neural network using the labeled data to distinguish the target class from the clutter class [24][25][26]. Differently, unsupervised methods draw inspiration from anomaly detection and build a network to define a region in the feature space to represent the behavior of clutter (target-absent) samples [27,28]. As a result, target-present samples can be detected as outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing image change detection (CD) focuses on identifying changes in phenomena or objects that have occurred in the same geographical area at different times [1]. Because synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are independent of weather and atmospheric conditions [2][3][4], SAR image CD has attracted increasing attention. Recently, SAR image CD has been widely used in a diversity of studies, such as disaster assessment [5], urban research [6], environmental monitoring [7], and forest resource monitoring [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%