2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-018-0099-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised phase mapping of X-ray diffraction data by nonnegative matrix factorization integrated with custom clustering

Abstract: Analyzing large X-ray diffraction (XRD) datasets is a key step in high-throughput mapping of the compositional phase diagrams of combinatorial materials libraries. Optimizing and automating this task can help accelerate the process of discovery of materials with novel and desirable properties. Here, we report a new method for pattern analysis and phase extraction of XRD datasets. The method expands the Nonnegative Matrix Factorization method, which has been used previously to analyze such datasets, by combinin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naturally, the F1 macro score is systematically lower than the F1 micro score, reflecting the The a-CNN trained after data augmentation has an accuracy of more than 93% and 89% for crystal dimensionality and space-group classifications, respectively. As far as we know, the accuracy is the higher up to date based on results found in literature for space-group classification algorithms trained with thousands of ICSD patterns and manual labelling by human experts 10,52 , and is also comparable to similar approaches in other kinds of diffraction data 8,19 . The neural network seems to be the most adequate method for high-throughput synthesis and characterization loops, as it also performs relatively well in terms of algorithm speed and in conditions of class imbalance.…”
Section: Classification Results and All Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Naturally, the F1 macro score is systematically lower than the F1 micro score, reflecting the The a-CNN trained after data augmentation has an accuracy of more than 93% and 89% for crystal dimensionality and space-group classifications, respectively. As far as we know, the accuracy is the higher up to date based on results found in literature for space-group classification algorithms trained with thousands of ICSD patterns and manual labelling by human experts 10,52 , and is also comparable to similar approaches in other kinds of diffraction data 8,19 . The neural network seems to be the most adequate method for high-throughput synthesis and characterization loops, as it also performs relatively well in terms of algorithm speed and in conditions of class imbalance.…”
Section: Classification Results and All Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For high-throughput XRD several software developments already accelerated phase analysis in MLs. [49][50][51][52][53][54] Instead of having to analyze hundreds of diffractogram, e.g., by non-negative matrix factorization a set of e.g., tens of similar patterns can be obtained which are then the start for an in-depth analysis. Concepts for using machine learning for data-guided experimentation were introduced, e.g.…”
Section: Requirements From and Interactions With Computational Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main idea of NMFk is to use the cohesion of the clusters (how compact they are) and the separation between them as a measure of the stability of the solutions of the minimization with different random initial guesses and hence the quality of a particular choice of N s . In previous works, NMFk even "shuffled" randomly the observed data C to increase the effect of robustness of the average solutions [41][42][43].…”
Section: Custom Clustering and Nmfkmentioning
confidence: 99%