2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-019-0196-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and interpretable classification of small X-ray diffraction datasets using data augmentation and deep neural networks

Abstract: X-ray diffraction (XRD) data acquisition and analysis is among the most time-consuming steps in the development cycle of novel thin-film materials. We propose a machine-learning-enabled approach to predict crystallographic dimensionality and space group from a limited number of thin-film XRD patterns. We overcome the scarce-data problem intrinsic to novel materials development by coupling a supervised machine learning approach with a model-agnostic, physics-informed data augmentation strategy using simulated d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
197
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the authors generated new training data that correspond to the typically experimental distortions. 134 A similar approach was also chosen by Wang et al, who built a convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify MOFs based on their X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns. Wang et al predicted the patterns for MOFs in the Cambridge Structure Database (CSD) and then augmented their data set by creating new patterns by merging the main peaks of the predicted patterns with (shuffled) noise from pattern they measured in their own lab.…”
Section: Selecting the Data: Dealing With Little Imbalanced And Nonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the authors generated new training data that correspond to the typically experimental distortions. 134 A similar approach was also chosen by Wang et al, who built a convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify MOFs based on their X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns. Wang et al predicted the patterns for MOFs in the Cambridge Structure Database (CSD) and then augmented their data set by creating new patterns by merging the main peaks of the predicted patterns with (shuffled) noise from pattern they measured in their own lab.…”
Section: Selecting the Data: Dealing With Little Imbalanced And Nonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Oviedo and his colleagues proposed a machine learning approach to predict crystallographic dimensionality and space groups from a limited number of thin-film XRD spectra. [2] Angelo's research group developed a robust CNN model to classify crystal structures and also unfolded the internal behavior of the classification model through visualization. [14] Miller's research group implemented a CNN to determine crystallography trained on imaging and diffraction data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al 21 refined atomic pair distribution functions in a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify SGs. For similar purposes, Park et al 22 , Vecsei et al 23 , Wang et al 24 , Oviedo et al 25 , and Aguiar et al 26 used powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) 1D curves, for which information such as peak positions, intensities, and fullwidths at half-maximum are mainly treated as the key input descriptors. In addition, Ziletti et al 27 (in a parent work of this study), Aguiar et al 28 , Kaufmann et al 29 , and Ziatdinov et al 30 developed DL models by extracting features from electron-beam based 2D DPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%