2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in LiDAR Semantic Segmentation with Self-Supervision and Gated Adapters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is a lack of extensive research on real-to-real domain adaptation in 3D LiDAR point clouds, there is no standard baseline with a predefined set of object classes. Every method tried to create its new object categories by merging pre-existing object labels; Therefore, we compare our method with two stateof-the-art UDA methods, namely UDASSGA [20], com-plete&Label (C&L) [31] and also with other methods such as (M+A)Ent [28], SWD [16] and CORAL [22] that were reported in the recent UDA paper UDASSGA [20]. To make the comparison fair, we have divided the experiments into two sections according to the used subsets of classes on which the state-of-the-art methods are evaluated, see IV-C and IV-D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is a lack of extensive research on real-to-real domain adaptation in 3D LiDAR point clouds, there is no standard baseline with a predefined set of object classes. Every method tried to create its new object categories by merging pre-existing object labels; Therefore, we compare our method with two stateof-the-art UDA methods, namely UDASSGA [20], com-plete&Label (C&L) [31] and also with other methods such as (M+A)Ent [28], SWD [16] and CORAL [22] that were reported in the recent UDA paper UDASSGA [20]. To make the comparison fair, we have divided the experiments into two sections according to the used subsets of classes on which the state-of-the-art methods are evaluated, see IV-C and IV-D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) for Point Cloud Segmentation. UDA for point cloud segmentation can be classified into two setups: (1) simulation-to-real [21], [33] and (2) real-to-real [31], [28], [20]. Simulation-to-real UDA is used when a deep learning-based model is trained with source domain from simulated or synthetically generated data and then tested on a target domain real-world data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After projection, RV images can be processed with existing 2D convolution networks. RV-based networks are affected by domain shift, which can be mitigated by using generative approaches [19], [24], feature alignment [19], [20], [24], and contrastive learning [27]. RayCast [24] tackles the real-toreal UDA problem by transferring the sensor pattern of the target domain to the source domain through ray casting.…”
Section: Domain Adaptation For Point Cloud Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SqueezeSegV2 [20] improves the SqueezeSeg [43] architecture, and reduces domain shift in the synth-to-real setup by aligning source and target features with a geodesic RayCast [24] real-to-real RV RangeNet++ [25] Sem.KITTI [5] nuSc. [7] ✓ ✓ ✓ ePointDA [19] synth-to-real RV SqueezeSegV2 [20] GTA-V [20] KITTI [26] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Sem.KITTI [5] SqueezeSegV2 [20] synth-to-real RV SqueezeSegV2 [20] GTA-V [20] KITTI [26] ✓ ✓ ✓ Gated [27] synth-to-real RV SalsaNext [28] GTA-V [20] KITTI [26] ✓ ✓ ✓ real-to-real nuScenes [7] KITTI [26] nuScenes [7] xMUDA [29] real-to-real 2D&3D xMUDA [29] nuSc. [7] nuSc.…”
Section: Domain Adaptation For Point Cloud Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation