2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
385
1
38

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
385
1
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Zirconia used as framework material appears to withstand the clinical forces during chewing and regular function and fracture rates are low and comparable to metal-based FDPs [17]. However, in contrast to metal-based FDPs, a higher rate of technical complications (major chippings) was reported [18,19]. The adhesion between zirconia and veneering ceramics is reported to be the critical issue for this observation [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Zirconia used as framework material appears to withstand the clinical forces during chewing and regular function and fracture rates are low and comparable to metal-based FDPs [17]. However, in contrast to metal-based FDPs, a higher rate of technical complications (major chippings) was reported [18,19]. The adhesion between zirconia and veneering ceramics is reported to be the critical issue for this observation [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…22,23 To some extent, this tensile stress is compensated by compression stress, but when excessive loads are applied, the tensile stress is higher and may lead to immediate crack development, increasing the likelihood of fracture. 22,24 Clinically, it has been observed that bilaminated crown failure occurs most frequently by the chipping of the porcelain. 2,5,6,25,26 In the present study, the failure mode analysis revealed a predominance of failure with porcelain cracking, corroborated by the results of another laboratory study.…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 For the zirconia- porcelain combination, despite the small difference in thermal expansion coefficients, the low thermal diffusivity of the zirconia results in a high temperature difference and very high residual tensile stresses within the porcelain. 22,23 To some extent, this tensile stress is compensated by compression stress, but when excessive loads are applied, the tensile stress is higher and may lead to immediate crack development, increasing the likelihood of fracture. 22,24 Clinically, it has been observed that bilaminated crown failure occurs most frequently by the chipping of the porcelain.…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, alumina has a thermal diffusivity (1.0 x 10 −5 m 2 sec −1 ) higher than that of zirconia (7.4 x 10 −7 m 2 sec −1 ), which allows alumina to be more effective in dissipating heat (Swain, 2009). Zirconia, with a lower thermal diffusivity, is more prone to generating high tensile residual stresses in the porcelain veneer, leading to premature veneer chipping or fracture, as theoretically predicted with flat specimens (Swain, 2009). However, alumina has a relatively low flexural strength, which makes alumina-based restorations susceptible to bulk fracture (Kelly, 1997;Oden et al, 1998;Hermann et al, 2006;Kokubo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%